235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18352920)
21. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Enamel loss associated with orthodontic adhesive removal on teeth with white spot lesions: an in vitro study.
Tüfekçi E; Merrill TE; Pintado MR; Beyer JP; Brantley WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jun; 125(6):733-9. PubMed ID: 15179398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fluorescence-aided identification technique using a low-cost violet flashlight and rotatory instruments for dental trauma splint removal.
Vilela ABF; Soares PBF; Gonçalves FS; Beaini TL; Peres TS; Soares CJ
Dent Traumatol; 2023 Dec; 39(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 37341416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surface finishing of glass ionomer.
Paulillo LA; Coradazzi JL; Lovadino JR; Serra MC
Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 9545889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Serra MC
Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites.
Reis AF; Giannini M; Lovadino JR; dos Santos Dias CT
Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12469758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding.
Cardoso LA; Valdrighi HC; Vedovello Filho M; Correr AB
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):105-12. PubMed ID: 25628087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives.
Trakyali G; Ozdemir FI; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 19460855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Enamel surface roughness after debonding.
Karan S; Kircelli BH; Tasdelen B
Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20677958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of human dental enamel after bracket debonding: a noncontact three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.
Ferreira FG; Nouer DF; Silva NP; Garbui IU; Correr-Sobrinho L; Nouer PR
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Sep; 18(7):1853-64. PubMed ID: 24327234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces.
Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparative analysis of adhesive resin removal methods.
Schiefelbein C; Rowland K
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(2):17-22. PubMed ID: 21827051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Removal of Invisalign retention attachments: a new minimally invasive method.
Ruiz JL; Finger WJ; Sasazaki H; Komatsu M
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009; 30(9):634-6, 638, 640 passim. PubMed ID: 19998730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy.
Botta AC; Duarte S; Paulin Filho PI; Gheno SM
Microsc Microanal; 2008 Oct; 14(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 18793482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques.
Mitchell CA; Pintado MR; Douglas WH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 12426504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols.
Yazici AR; Müftü A; Kugel G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):9-17. PubMed ID: 17618325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
Uçtaşli MB; Arisu HD; Omürlü H; Eligüzeloğlu E; Ozcan S; Ergun G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Atomic force microscopy analysis of enamel nanotopography after interproximal reduction.
Meredith L; Farella M; Lowrey S; Cannon RD; Mei L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Apr; 151(4):750-757. PubMed ID: 28364899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficiency of different protocols for enamel clean-up after bracket debonding: an in vitro study.
Sigilião LC; Marquezan M; Elias CN; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 20(5):78-85. PubMed ID: 26560825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of four finishing systems on one ceramic surface.
Martínez-Gomis J; Bizar J; Anglada JM; Samsó J; Peraire M
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 12675460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
