These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18353462)

  • 1. 40 years since Killip clinical classification.
    Ivanusa M; Milicic D
    Int J Cardiol; 2009 May; 134(3):420-1. PubMed ID: 18353462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The enduring value of Killip classification.
    Werns SW; Bates ER
    Am Heart J; 1999 Feb; 137(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 9924153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of Killip class on admission and left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction: a closer look into an old clinical classification.
    Nesković AN; Otasević P; Bojić M; Popović AD
    Am Heart J; 1999 Feb; 137(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 9924172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serum uric acid in acute myocardial infarction.
    Nadkar MY; Jain VI
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2008 Oct; 56():759-62. PubMed ID: 19263700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter for Killip classification and glucose level in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Lin GM; Li YH; Han CL
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 May; 29(4):462; author reply 462-3. PubMed ID: 21266299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Admission B-type natriuretic peptide assessment improves early risk stratification by Killip classes and TIMI risk score in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty.
    Grabowski M; Filipiak KJ; Malek LA; Karpinski G; Huczek Z; Stolarz P; Spiewak M; Kochman J; Rudowski R; Opolski G
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 Feb; 115(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 16860415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STEMI or NSTEMI, i.e. ST-evaluation or non-ST-evaluation myocardial infarction?
    Mauric AT; Oreto G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Jan; 9(1):81-2. PubMed ID: 18268425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is coding for myocardial infarction more accurate now that coding descriptions have been clarified to distinguish ST-elevation myocardial infarction from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction?
    Steinberg BA; French WJ; Peterson E; Frederick PD; Cannon CP;
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 102(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 18721504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Usefulness of a new prognostic index for patients with myocardial infarction].
    Van Hao N; Bielczyński J
    Wiad Lek; 1990 Feb 1-15; 43(3-4):93-5. PubMed ID: 2368398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying and classifying myocardial infarctions.
    Mandell BF
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2009 Mar; 76(3):150. PubMed ID: 19258458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of myocardial infarction: a clinical dilemma.
    Erhardt LR
    Eur J Cardiol; 1976 Jun; 4(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 1278202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Risk classification of patients with acute myocardial infarct using two-dimensional echocardiography].
    Zenker G; Kandlhofer B; Forche G; Harnoncourt K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1983 Oct; 95(19):680-4. PubMed ID: 6666156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of transmural extent of infarction with contrast echocardiographically derived index of myocardial blood flow and myocardial blood volume fraction: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Choi EY; Seo HS; Park S; Kim HJ; Ahn JA; Ko YG; Choi BW; Kang SM; Choi D; Ha JW; Rim SJ; Jang Y; Chung N
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 19(10):1211-9. PubMed ID: 17000359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical features and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction among patients aged 80 years or older].
    Ugalde H; Espinosa P; Pizarro G; Dreyse X
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jun; 136(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 18769824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weekend admission for myocardial infarction.
    Becker DJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(1):87; author reply 87-8. PubMed ID: 17615633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing classification of acute myocardial infarction: from diagnosis to prognosis.
    Mathew TP; Menown IB; Adgey AA
    Eur Heart J; 1999 Oct; 20(20):1446-8. PubMed ID: 10493841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term significance of Killip class and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
    Parakh K; Thombs BD; Bhat U; Fauerbach JA; Bush DE; Ziegelstein RC
    Am J Med; 2008 Nov; 121(11):1015-8. PubMed ID: 18954850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the Norris and Killip coronary prognostic indices.
    Horwitz RI; Cicchetti DV; Horwitz SM
    J Chronic Dis; 1984; 37(5):369-75. PubMed ID: 6715502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiological classification of acute myocardial infarction: time for a change?
    Porela P; Helenius H; Pulkki K; Voipio-Pulkki LM
    Eur Heart J; 1999 Oct; 20(20):1459-64. PubMed ID: 10493844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Killip and Forrester classifications for patients with acute myocardial infarction].
    Katsuki T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2003 May; 61 Suppl 5():456-9. PubMed ID: 12808984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.