213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18354872)
1. Patients as consumers: courts, contracts, and the new medical marketplace.
Hall MA; Schneider CE
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Feb; 106(4):643-89. PubMed ID: 18354872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consumer-directed health care and the courts: let the buyer (and seller) beware.
Jacobson PD; Tunick MR
Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(3):704-14. PubMed ID: 17485747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standards of care and standard form contracts: distinguishing patient rights and consumer rights in managed care.
Mariner WK
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1998; 15(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 9988993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness research as choice architecture: the behavioral law and economics solution to the health care cost crisis.
Korobkin R
Mich Law Rev; 2014 Feb; 112(4):523-74. PubMed ID: 24446572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ClintonCare II: the revenge.
Scott JS
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 Jan; 52(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 10175101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Issues of quality and consumer rights in the health care market.
Copeland C
EBRI Issue Brief; 1998 Apr; (196):1-27. PubMed ID: 10177730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State regulation of private health insurance: prescription drug benefits, experimental treatments, and consumer protection.
Bolin JN; Buchanan RJ; Smith SR
Am J Manag Care; 2002 Nov; 8(11):977-85. PubMed ID: 12437312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Progress and promise.
Alter J
State Health Care Am; 1994; ():8-16. PubMed ID: 10133854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wielding the wand without facing the music: allowing utilization review physicians to trump doctors' orders, but protecting them from legal risk ordinarily attached to the medical degree.
Record KL
Duke Law J; 2010 Feb; 59(5):955-1000. PubMed ID: 20235400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management by objection? Public policies to protect choice in health plans.
Brown LD
Med Care Res Rev; 1999; 56 Suppl 1():145-65; discussion 166-76. PubMed ID: 10354682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Department of Justice challenging big insurers' "Most Favored Nation" clauses.
Stepovich M
Health Care Law Newsl; 1995 Sep; 10(9):3-4. PubMed ID: 10144889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finance issue brief: any willing provider: year end report-2002.
Morgan R; MacEachern L
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2002 Dec; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 12884878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumers versus managed care: the new class actions.
Havighurst CC
Health Aff (Millwood); 2001; 20(4):8-27. PubMed ID: 11463093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective self-denial: can consumers contract today to accept health care rationing tomorrow?
Havighurst CC
Univ PA Law Rev; 1992 May; 140(5):1755-808. PubMed ID: 11651595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Unmanaged care?
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1994 Dec; 26(50):2903-7. PubMed ID: 10138983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The year ahead: top policy priorities for 1998.
Peterson C
Healthplan; 1998; 39(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 10176899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. SADA communique: Managed care and preferred provider contracts.
Govan P
SADJ; 2013 Mar; 68(2):56-7. PubMed ID: 23951763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preferred providers and the credible commitment problem in health insurance: first experiences with the implementation of managed competition in the Dutch health care system.
Boonen LH; Schut FT
Health Econ Policy Law; 2011 Apr; 6(2):219-35. PubMed ID: 21122187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An ethical perspective on health care insurance reform.
Brennan TA
Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(1-2):37-74. PubMed ID: 8368202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Federal health care reform legislation establishes consumer protections, health insurance exchanges.
Goodwin W
N C Med J; 2010; 71(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 20681491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
