These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18354932)

  • 1. Intensifying instruction: Does additional instructional time make a difference for the most at-risk first graders?
    Harn BA; Linan-Thompson S; Roberts G
    J Learn Disabil; 2008; 41(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 18354932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of small-group reading instruction and curriculum differences for students most at risk in kindergartenL: two-year results for secondary- and tertiary-level interventions.
    Kamps D; Abbott M; Greenwood C; Wills H; Veerkamp M; Kaufman J
    J Learn Disabil; 2008; 41(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 18354931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instruction in high schools: the evidence and the challenge.
    Corcoran T; Silander M
    Future Child; 2009; 19(1):157-83. PubMed ID: 21141709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delving Into the Details: Implementing Multitiered K-3 Reading Supports in High-Priority Schools.
    Coyne MD; Oldham A; Leonard K; Burns D; Gage N
    New Dir Child Adolesc Dev; 2016 Dec; 2016(154):67-85. PubMed ID: 27922222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classroom quality as a predictor of first graders' time in non-instructional activities and literacy achievement.
    McLean L; Sparapani N; Toste JR; Connor CM
    J Sch Psychol; 2016 Jun; 56():45-58. PubMed ID: 27268569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Examination of the Efficacy of a Multitiered Intervention on Early Reading Outcomes for First Grade Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties.
    Fien H; Smith JL; Smolkowski K; Baker SK; Nelson NJ; Chaparro E
    J Learn Disabil; 2015; 48(6):602-21. PubMed ID: 24532827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [From brain imaging to good teaching? implicating from neuroscience for research on learning and instruction].
    Stubenrauch C; Krinzinger H; Konrad K
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2014 Jul; 42(4):253-68; quiz 268-9. PubMed ID: 25005903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches.
    Torgesen JK; Wagner RK; Rashotte CA; Herron J; Lindamood P
    Ann Dyslexia; 2010 Jun; 60(1):40-56. PubMed ID: 20052566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Formulating secondary-level reading interventions.
    Kamps DM; Greenwood CR
    J Learn Disabil; 2005; 38(6):500-9. PubMed ID: 16392691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: some answers and lingering questions.
    Denton CA
    J Learn Disabil; 2012; 45(3):232-43. PubMed ID: 22491812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prologue to the Forum: Vocabulary Across the School Grades.
    Adlof SM
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2019 Oct; 50(4):461-465. PubMed ID: 31600464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Schools as host environments: toward a schoolwide reading improvement model.
    Kame'enui EJ; Simmons DC; Coyne MD
    Ann Dyslexia; 2000 Jan; 50(1):31-51. PubMed ID: 20563779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making instruction and assessment responsive to diverse students' progress: group-administered dynamic assessment in teaching mathematics.
    Jeltova I; Birney D; Fredine N; Jarvin L; Sternberg RJ; Grigorenko EL
    J Learn Disabil; 2011; 44(4):381-95. PubMed ID: 21965254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: changes in teaching and student outcomes.
    O'Connor RE; Fulmer D; Harty KR; Bell KM
    J Learn Disabil; 2005; 38(5):440-55. PubMed ID: 16329445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of varying group size on the reading recovery approach to preventive early intervention.
    Iversen S; Tunmer WE; Chapman JW
    J Learn Disabil; 2005; 38(5):456-72. PubMed ID: 16329446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties.
    Vaughn S; Linan-Thompson S; Mathes PG; Cirino PT; Carlson CD; Pollard-Durodola SD; Cardenas-Hagan E; Francis DJ
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 16512083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum?
    Henzi D; Davis E; Jasinevicius R; Hendricson W
    J Dent Educ; 2007 May; 71(5):632-45. PubMed ID: 17493972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities.
    Kennedy MJ; Deshler DD; Lloyd JW
    J Learn Disabil; 2015; 48(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 23649222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction to the special series on systemic, multitier instructional models: emerging research on factors that support prevention of reading difficulties.
    Chard DJ; Linan-Thompson S
    J Learn Disabil; 2008; 41(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 18354930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers.
    Berninger VW; Abbott RD; Vermeulen K; Fulton CM
    J Learn Disabil; 2006; 39(4):334-51. PubMed ID: 16895158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.