These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18354978)

  • 1. The effect of stimulus modality on signal detection: implications for assessing the safety of in-vehicle technology.
    Merat N; Jamson AH
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 18354978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skill acquisition while operating in-vehicle information systems: interface design determines the level of safety-relevant distractions.
    Jahn G; Krems JF; Gelau C
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):136-51. PubMed ID: 19653479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the effects of an eco-driving message on driver distraction.
    Rouzikhah H; King M; Rakotonirainy A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():975-83. PubMed ID: 22910188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of voice technology on test track driving performance: implications for driver distraction.
    Ranney TA; Harbluk JL; Noy YI
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):439-54. PubMed ID: 16170949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance.
    Blanco M; Biever WJ; Gallagher JP; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):895-906. PubMed ID: 16584702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 17109807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 19750791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems.
    Maciej J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 19664428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The implications of cross-regional differences for the design of In-vehicle Information Systems: a comparison of Australian and Chinese drivers.
    Young KL; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG; Williamson AR
    Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):564-73. PubMed ID: 21944830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual attention in driving: the effects of cognitive load and visual disruption.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 17702223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of working memory in supporting drivers' situation awareness for surrounding traffic.
    Johannsdottir KR; Herdman CM
    Hum Factors; 2010 Dec; 52(6):663-73. PubMed ID: 21284368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction.
    Noy YI; Lemoine TL; Klachan C; Burns PC
    Appl Ergon; 2004 May; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 15145283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):785-804. PubMed ID: 17240725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of using a portable music player on simulated driving performance and task-sharing strategies.
    Young KL; Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Rudin-Brown CM; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):738-46. PubMed ID: 22118952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On-Road Evaluation of In-vehicle Interface Characteristics and Their Effects on Performance of Visual Detection on the Road and Manual Entry.
    Suh Y; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 30059239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.