These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18354978)

  • 21. The Attentional Demand of Automobile Driving Revisited: Occlusion Distance as a Function of Task-Relevant Event Density in Realistic Driving Scenarios.
    Kujala T; Mäkelä J; Kotilainen I; Tokkonen T
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 26238120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.
    Merat N; Jamson AH; Lai FC; Carsten O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):762-71. PubMed ID: 23156621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance.
    Horberry T; Anderson J; Regan MA; Triggs TJ; Brown J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jan; 38(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 16226211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A
    J Safety Res; 2009; 40(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19285580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Allocation of Driver Attention for Varying In-Vehicle System Modalities.
    Li N; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1349-1364. PubMed ID: 31887066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age-Related Differences in the Cognitive, Visual, and Temporal Demands of In-Vehicle Information Systems.
    Cooper JM; Wheatley CL; McCarty MM; Motzkus CJ; Lopes CL; Erickson GG; Baucom BRW; Horrey WJ; Strayer DL
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1154. PubMed ID: 32581959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction.
    Liang Y; Horrey WJ; Hoffman JD
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 25850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality.
    Horrey WJ; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):611-24. PubMed ID: 15709324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation of auditory detection response task method for assessing the attentional effects of cognitive load.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 29461865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the awareness of performance decrements in distracted drivers.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Garabet A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):675-82. PubMed ID: 18329420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Commercial motor vehicle driving performance: An examination of attentional resources and control using a driving simulator.
    McManus B; Heaton K; Stavrinos D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Jun; 23(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 28368189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mitigating the effects of in-vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm.
    Hibberd DL; Jamson SL; Carsten OM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1096-103. PubMed ID: 22999382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Control task substitution in semiautomated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated?
    Carsten O; Lai FC; Barnard Y; Jamson AH; Merat N
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):747-61. PubMed ID: 23156620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of simulated cataracts on drivers' hazard perception ability.
    Marrington SA; Horswill MS; Wood JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1121-7. PubMed ID: 19050466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Practical issues in the application of occlusion to measure visual demands imposed on drivers by in-vehicle tasks.
    Brook-Carter N; Stevens A; Reed N; Thompson S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 18651286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use patterns among early adopters of adaptive cruise control.
    Xiong H; Boyle LN; Moeckli J; Dow BR; Brown TL
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):722-33. PubMed ID: 23156618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of a computer-based training module on drivers' willingness to engage in distracting activities.
    Horrey WJ; Lesch MF; Kramer AF; Melton DF
    Hum Factors; 2009 Aug; 51(4):571-81. PubMed ID: 19899365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies.
    Horrey WJ; Wickens CD; Consalus KP
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Jun; 12(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 16802889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.