These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18355195)

  • 1. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test to detect type IV sensitization in patients with allergic contact dermatitis.
    Dickel H; Geier J; Kuss O; Altmeyer P
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2008 Dec; 22(12):1516-7. PubMed ID: 18355195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Add-on diagnostic tool for allergic contact dermatitis: the strip patch test.
    Hessam S; Altmeyer P; Dickel H
    G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Feb; 147(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 22370574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.
    de Waard-van der Spek FB; Oranje AP
    Dermatology; 2009; 218(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18946202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
    Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there an in vitro test for type IV allergy discriminating between sensitization and allergic disease?
    Traidl-Hoffmann C; Ring J
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2008 Sep; 38(9):1412-5. PubMed ID: 18644023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis.
    Keir J; English J; Fergie N
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 May; 123(5):558-9. PubMed ID: 19138454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate.
    Isaksson M; Lindberg M; Sundberg K; Hallander A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 16283908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patch test results with metals and meteorological conditions.
    Hegewald J; Uter W; Kranke B; Schnuch A; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 147(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 18594154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lymphocyte proliferation testing in chromium allergic contact dermatitis.
    Martins LE; Duarte AJ; Aoki V; Nunes RS; Ogusuku S; Reis VM
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2008 Jul; 33(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 18582233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failure to induce sensitization to budesonide in the guinea pig.
    Isaksson M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jan; 48(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 12641581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strip patch test vs. conventional patch test: investigation of dose-dependent test sensitivities in nickel- and chromium-sensitive subjects.
    Dickel H; Kamphowe J; Geier J; Altmeyer P; Kuss O
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 19470058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lymphocyte transformation test in patients with allergic contact dermatitis.
    Basketter D; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):1. PubMed ID: 15982223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scratch-patch test for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis to aciclovir.
    Nino M; Balato N; Di Costanzo L; Gaudiello F
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 19125724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Patch-test methods: materials and allergens].
    Raison-Peyron N
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009; 136(8-9):585-91. PubMed ID: 19686891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Commentary: has patch-testing the value of challenge test in dermatology?].
    Vaillant L; Machet L; Lorette G
    Therapie; 1993; 48(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 8351686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. p-Phenylenediamine sensitization is more prevalent in central and southern European patch test centres than in Scandinavian: results from a multicentre study.
    Thyssen JP; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Diepgen T; Giménez-Arnau AM; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; Le Coz C; McFadden J; Rustemeyer T; White IR; White JM; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jun; 60(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 19489965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anogenital allergic contact dermatitis, the role of spices and flavour allergy.
    Vermaat H; Smienk F; Rustemeyer T; Bruynzeel DP; Kirtschig G
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 18844699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dispelling the myths behind pediatric patch testing-experience from our tertiary care patch testing centers.
    Jacob SE; Steele T; Brod B; Crawford GH
    Pediatr Dermatol; 2008; 25(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 18577031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Guidelines for contact dermatitis -one point advice-].
    Yagami A; Matsunaga K
    Arerugi; 2013 Jul; 62(7):806-12. PubMed ID: 24129656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence of contact allergens in a Hispanic population.
    Collazo MH; Figueroa LD; Sánchez JL
    P R Health Sci J; 2008 Dec; 27(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 19069359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.