These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18355195)

  • 21. A review of critical factors in the conduct and interpretation of the human repeat insult patch test.
    McNamee PM; Api AM; Basketter DA; Frank Gerberick G; Gilpin DA; Hall BM; Jowsey I; Robinson MK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 52(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18639964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patch test reaction on Ethiopian subjects with eczema.
    Bilcha KD; Shibeshi D; Grangsjo A; Hiletework M
    Int J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 48(9):979-83. PubMed ID: 19702984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anogenital dermatitis in patients referred for patch testing: retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2004.
    Warshaw EM; Furda LM; Maibach HI; Rietschel RL; Fowler JF; Belsito DV; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 144(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 18559763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to dimethyl sulfate following sensitization from a severe acute irritant reaction to the reagent.
    Yagami A; Kawai N; Kosai N; Inoue T; Suzuki K; Matsunaga K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 19260926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How to test for contact allergy in patients with fragile skin.
    Morren MA; Van Laethem A; Quartier S; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):174-5. PubMed ID: 20690945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contact allergens in persons with leg ulcers: a Canadian study in contact sensitization.
    Smart V; Alavi A; Coutts P; Fierheller M; Coelho S; Linn Holness D; Sibbald RG
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2008 Sep; 7(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 18757387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stochastic resonance and angry back syndrome: noisy skin.
    Rietschel RL
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Sep; 7(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 8957329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Peculiarities of patch testing in children].
    Vigan M
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009; 136(8-9):617-20. PubMed ID: 19686898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [How to test occupational products brought in by patients].
    Geraut C; Belli M; Geraut L; Tripodi D
    Ann Dermatol Venereol; 2009; 136(8-9):600-1. PubMed ID: 19686894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Late patch test reactions: delayed immune response appears to be more common than active sensitization.
    Gawkrodger DJ; Paul L
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Sep; 59(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 18759909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of patch testing in contact urticaria.
    Nijhawan RI; Jacob SE
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):354-5. PubMed ID: 18638636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative relationships between patch test reactivity and use test reactivity: an overview.
    Zaghi D; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 18988092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sources of sensitization, cross-reactions, and occupational sensitization to topical anaesthetics among general dermatology patients.
    Jussi L; Lammintausta K
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 19260912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
    Frick-Engfeldt M; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Hauksson I; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 20946457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical expression of nickel contact dermatitis primed by diagnostic patch test.
    Theler B; Bucher C; French LE; Ballmer Weber B; Hofbauer GF
    Dermatology; 2009; 219(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 19349696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Performing patch testing with contact allergens].
    ; ; Schnuch A; Aberer W; Agathos M; Becker D; Brasch J; Elsner P; Frosch PJ; Fuchs T; Geier J; Hillen U; Löffler H; Mahler V; Richter G; Szliska C;
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2008 Sep; 6(9):770-5. PubMed ID: 19000065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006.
    Hammonds LM; Hall VC; Yiannias JA
    Int J Dermatol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 19261015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are we biased when reading a doubtful patch test reaction to a 'clear-cut' allergen such as the thiuram mix?
    Uter W; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Schnuch A; Pfahlberg A; Gefeller O
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):234-5. PubMed ID: 19338601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of chromium allergy by cellular in vitro methods.
    Lindemann M; Rietschel F; Zabel M; Grosse-Wilde H
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2008 Sep; 38(9):1468-75. PubMed ID: 18384428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Formaldehyde-releasers: relationship to formaldehyde contact allergy. Contact allergy to formaldehyde and inventory of formaldehyde-releasers.
    de Groot AC; Flyvholm MA; Lensen G; Menné T; Coenraads PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Aug; 61(2):63-85. PubMed ID: 19706047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.