394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18355783)
1. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Sharma G; Davis J; Gross S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 199(1):19.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18355783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical considerations of early (first vs. second trimester) risk assessment disclosure for trisomy 21 and patient choice in screening versus diagnostic testing.
Sharma G; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2007 Feb; 145C(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 17299736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical considerations in first-trimester Down syndrome risk assessment.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 22(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 20125014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences.
García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 35(7):410-4. PubMed ID: 19567688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lethal autonomy: the malfunction of the informed consent mechanism within the context of prenatal diagnosis of genetic variants.
Dunne C; Warren C
Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(2):165-202. PubMed ID: 9807244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical implications of the ethics of informed consent for first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Chasen ST
Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 16104682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):311-6. PubMed ID: 2304702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
Tauer CA
AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21: ethical considerations.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1777-81. PubMed ID: 15970806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical dimensions of first-trimester fetal aneuploidy screening.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):226-31. PubMed ID: 24351442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis: a bioethical reflection on the use of noninvasive prenatal diagnosis from the analysis of nucleic acids present in maternal peripheral blood].
González-Melado FJ; Di Pietro ML
Cuad Bioet; 2011; 22(74):49-75. PubMed ID: 21692554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An ethically justified decision-making pathway for the management of pregnancies complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.
Skupski D; Chervenak FA; McCullough L
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(5):339-42. PubMed ID: 17556820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.
Bunnik EM; de Jong A; Nijsingh N; de Wert GM
Bioethics; 2013 Jul; 27(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 23718722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information preferences of high literacy pregnant women regarding informed consent models for genetic carrier screening.
Ormond KE; Banuvar S; Daly A; Iris M; Minogue J; Elias S
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 May; 75(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 19013744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The federal government and academic texts as barriers to informed consent.
Lanfranchi A
Issues Law Med; 2008; 24(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18771039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical considerations in prenatal diagnosis.
Gates EA
West J Med; 1993 Sep; 159(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 8236982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Patient autonomy and informed consent in clinical practice].
Pedersen R; Hofmann B; Mangset M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1644-7. PubMed ID: 17571103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 12797097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
