These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1835594)

  • 1. Evaluation of hospital care in a radiotherapy department in north-eastern Italy.
    Talamini R; Boz G; Franceschi S; Franchin G; Trovò MG
    Eur J Cancer; 1991; 27(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 1835594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients' satisfaction.
    Brédart A; Razavi D; Robertson C; Didier F; Scaffidi E; Fonzo D; Autier P; de Haes JC
    Oncology; 2001; 61(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 11528250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' satisfaction towards radiological service and associated factors in Hawassa University Teaching and referral hospital, Southern Ethiopia.
    Mulisa T; Tessema F; Merga H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 17(1):441. PubMed ID: 28651581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PATIENT'S PERCEPTION ON THE QUALITY OF RADIOTHERAPY SERVICES IN TWO TEACHING HOSPITALS IN NIGERIA.
    Sowunmi AC; Fatiregun OA; Alabi AO; Zaccheus IA; Kingsley IA; Oyedeji SA
    Niger J Med; 2015; 24(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 27487596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient satisfaction on a medical day ward: a comparison of nurse-led and physician-led services.
    Sitzia J; Fitt J; Buckingham R; Dikken C
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1996 Apr; 8(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 8792173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement.
    Muntlin A; Gunningberg L; Carlsson M
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Aug; 15(8):1045-56. PubMed ID: 16879549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patients' reaction to the ethical conduct of radiographers and staff services as predictors of radiological experience satisfaction: a cross-sectional study.
    Ochonma OG; Eze CU; Eze SB; Okaro AO
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 26450173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Patient satisfaction with the work of the hospital medical personnel].
    Miseviciene I; Milasauskiene Z
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2002; 38(5):559-65. PubMed ID: 12474691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlled trial of a patient-completed history questionnaire: effects on quality of documentation and patient and physician satisfaction.
    Hershey CO; Grant BJ
    Am J Med Qual; 2002; 17(4):126-35. PubMed ID: 12153065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of specialists' outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialists, and general practitioners.
    Bowling A; Stramer K; Dickinson E; Windsor J; Bond M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Feb; 51(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 9135789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does tumor status influence cancer patients' satisfaction with the doctor-patient interaction?
    Bitar R; Bezjak A; Mah K; Loblaw DA; Gotowiec AP; Devins GM
    Support Care Cancer; 2004 Jan; 12(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 14586667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of quality of care of patients with potentially severe diseases evaluated at a distinct quick diagnostic delivery model: a cross-sectional study.
    Sanclemente-Ansó C; Salazar A; Bosch X; Capdevila C; Giménez-Requena A; Rosón-Hernández B; Corbella X
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():434. PubMed ID: 26420244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of hospital service: a study comparing 'Asian' and 'non-Asian' patients in Middlesbrough.
    Madhok R; Bhopal RS; Ramaiah RS
    J Public Health Med; 1992 Sep; 14(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 1419205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Inpatients' opinion on quality of health care].
    Brogiene D; Gurevicius R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2009; 45(3):226-37. PubMed ID: 19357453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors associated with patient satisfaction with care among dermatological outpatients.
    Renzi C; Abeni D; Picardi A; Agostini E; Melchi CF; Pasquini P; Puddu P; Braga M
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Oct; 145(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 11703289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients' satisfaction ratings and their desire for care improvement across oncology settings from France, Italy, Poland and Sweden.
    Brédart A; Robertson C; Razavi D; Batel-Copel L; Larsson G; Lichosik D; Meyza J; Schraub S; von Essen L; de Haes JC
    Psychooncology; 2003; 12(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 12548649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting patient satisfaction with emergency department care: an Italian rural hospital.
    Messina G; Vencia F; Mecheroni S; Dionisi S; Baragatti L; Nante N
    Glob J Health Sci; 2014 Dec; 7(4):30-9. PubMed ID: 25946915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.
    ; ;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(1 Suppl 1):1-225. PubMed ID: 23585445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Satisfaction with hospital care among diabetic outpatients and its associated factors. Secondary use of official statistics].
    Tsuboi S; Uehara R; Oguma T; Kojo T; Enkh-Oyun T; Kotani K; Aoyama Y; Okayama A; Hashimoto S; Yamagata Z; Ohashi Y; Katanoda K; Nakamura Y; Sobue T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2014; 61(10):613-24. PubMed ID: 25427588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.