These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

919 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18355949)

  • 1. Influence of orthotic devices prescribed using pressure data on lower extremity kinematics and pressures beneath the shoe during running.
    Dixon SJ; McNally K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Jun; 23(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners.
    MacLean C; Davis IM; Hamill J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 16603287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short- and long-term influences of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics.
    MacLean CL; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Clin J Sport Med; 2008 Jul; 18(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 18614885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in running kinematics and kinetics in response to a rockered shoe intervention.
    Boyer KA; Andriacchi TP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Dec; 24(10):872-6. PubMed ID: 19744753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of inverted orthoses on lower-extremity mechanics in runners.
    Williams DS; McClay Davis I; Baitch SP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Dec; 35(12):2060-8. PubMed ID: 14652503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of motion control shoes on the running gait of mature and young females.
    Lilley K; Stiles V; Dixon S
    Gait Posture; 2013 Mar; 37(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23122596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of neutral-cushioned running shoes on plantar pressure loading and comfort in athletes with cavus feet: a crossover randomized controlled trial.
    Wegener C; Burns J; Penkala S
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):2139-46. PubMed ID: 18577583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of foot orthotics on rearfoot and tibia joint coupling patterns and variability.
    Ferber R; Davis IM; Williams DS
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 15652545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of shoe inserts on kinematics, center of pressure, and leg joint moments during running.
    Nigg BM; Stergiou P; Cole G; Stefanyshyn D; Mündermann A; Humble N
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Feb; 35(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 12569222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of sole wedges on frontal plane knee kinetics, in isolation and in combination with representative rigid and semi-rigid ankle-foot-orthoses.
    Schmalz T; Blumentritt S; Drewitz H; Freslier M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 16567026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in plantar loading between training shoes and racing flats at a self-selected running speed.
    Wiegerinck JI; Boyd J; Yoder JC; Abbey AN; Nunley JA; Queen RM
    Gait Posture; 2009 Apr; 29(3):514-9. PubMed ID: 19147359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running.
    Chuckpaiwong B; Nunley JA; Mall NA; Queen RM
    Gait Posture; 2008 Oct; 28(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 18337103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of shoe type on plantar pressure: a gender comparison.
    Queen RM; Abbey AN; Wiegerinck JI; Yoder JC; Nunley JA
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jan; 31(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 19765995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of different shoe-lacing patterns on the biomechanics of running shoes.
    Hagen M; Hennig EM
    J Sports Sci; 2009 Feb; 27(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 19156560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of enhanced plantar sensory feedback and foot orthoses on midfoot kinematics and lower leg neuromuscular activation.
    Ritchie C; Paterson K; Bryant AL; Bartold S; Clark RA
    Gait Posture; 2011 Apr; 33(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 21353563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of laterally wedged foot orthoses on rearfoot and hip mechanics in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.
    Butler RJ; Barrios JA; Royer T; Davis IS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 19367514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resistance training is accompanied by increases in hip strength and changes in lower extremity biomechanics during running.
    Snyder KR; Earl JE; O'Connor KM; Ebersole KT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Jan; 24(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 19013697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of running shoe midsole composition and custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics during running.
    Maclean CL; Davis IS; Hamill J
    J Appl Biomech; 2009 Feb; 25(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 19299830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running.
    Clarke TE; Frederick EC; Hamill CL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1983; 15(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 6645865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.