BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18356122)

  • 1. Mechanical verification of soft-tissue attachment on bioactive glasses and titanium implants.
    Zhao D; Moritz N; Vedel E; Hupa L; Aro HT
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Jul; 4(4):1118-22. PubMed ID: 18356122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binary CaO-SiO(2) gel-glasses for biomedical applications.
    Saravanapavan P; Jones JR; Verrier S; Beilby R; Shirtliff VJ; Hench LL; Polak JM
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(4):467-86. PubMed ID: 15472395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tissue reaction to soft-tissue anchored percutaneous implants in rabbits.
    Jansen JA; Paquay YG; van der Waerden JP
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Sep; 28(9):1047-54. PubMed ID: 7814432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical attachment of soft fibrous tissues to implants by using mesh structures.
    Asoda S; Arita T; Koshitomae H; Takakuda K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1171-7. PubMed ID: 18983321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of sol-gel-derived titania coating for direct soft tissue attachment.
    Areva S; Paldan H; Peltola T; Närhi T; Jokinen M; Lindén M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Aug; 70(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 15227661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue attachment on sol-gel-treated titanium implants in vivo.
    Paldan H; Areva S; Tirri T; Peltola T; Lindholm TC; Lassila L; Pelliniemi LJ; Happonen RP; Närhi TO
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Mar; 19(3):1283-90. PubMed ID: 17710511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A one stage versus two stage surgical technique. Tissue reaction to a percutaneous device provided with titanium fiber mesh applicable for peritoneal dialysis.
    Paquay YC; De Ruijter AE; van der Waerden JP; Jansen JA
    ASAIO J; 1996; 42(6):961-7. PubMed ID: 8959270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone attachment to glass-fibre-reinforced composite implant with porous surface.
    Mattila RH; Laurila P; Rekola J; Gunn J; Lassila LV; Mäntylä T; Aho AJ; Vallittu PK
    Acta Biomater; 2009 Jun; 5(5):1639-46. PubMed ID: 19268643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Tissue reaction after implantation of ceramic biomaterials with introduced electrokinetic zeta potential on surface].
    Lewandowski R; Rutowski R; Staniszewska-Kuś J; Pielka S; Wnukiewicz B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15222224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of surface topography on the connective tissue attachment to subcutaneous implants.
    Kim H; Murakami H; Chehroudi B; Textor M; Brunette DM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(3):354-65. PubMed ID: 16796277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Titanium mesh implantation--a method to stabilize the spine and protect the spinal cord following a multilevel laminectomy in the adult rat.
    Nieto JH; Hoang TX; Warner EA; Franchini BT; Westerlund U; Havton LA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Aug; 147(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16024086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biologic significance of surface microroughing in bone incorporation of porous bioactive glass implants.
    Itälä A; Koort J; Ylänen HO; Hupa M; Aro HT
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Nov; 67(2):496-503. PubMed ID: 14566790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of peribulbar soft tissue reactions to titanium mesh in experimental tests in animals].
    Siluk J
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():135-43. PubMed ID: 14601474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Titanium fiber mesh anchorage for percutaneous devices applicable for peritoneal dialysis.
    Paquay YC; de Ruijter JE; van der Waerden JP; Jansen JA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Nov; 28(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 7829562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of oral and extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants by using a mesh structure for connective tissue attachment.
    Mita A; Yagihara A; Wang W; Takakuda K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2014 Mar; 61(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 24658962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of molecular mobility of polymeric implants on soft tissue reactions: an in vivo study in rats.
    Andersson M; Suska F; Johansson A; Berglin M; Emanuelsson L; Elwing H; Thomsen P
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Mar; 84(3):652-60. PubMed ID: 17635028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a multi-component fiber-reinforced composite implant for load-sharing conditions.
    Zhao DS; Moritz N; Laurila P; Mattila R; Lassila LV; Strandberg N; Mäntylä T; Vallittu PK; Aro HT
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 19109047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone.
    Aita H; Hori N; Takeuchi M; Suzuki T; Yamada M; Anpo M; Ogawa T
    Biomaterials; 2009 Feb; 30(6):1015-25. PubMed ID: 19042016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a new percutaneous access device for implantation in soft tissues.
    Jansen JA; van der Waerden JP; de Groot K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Dec; 25(12):1535-45. PubMed ID: 1794999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical attachment of soft tissue to dental and maxillofacial implants with mesh structures: an experiment in percutaneous model.
    Asoda S; Arita T; Takakuda K
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 May; 101(4):553-9. PubMed ID: 23281217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.