These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18356428)

  • 1. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.
    Gromet M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
    Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
    Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review.
    Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Burke P; Visioli C; Paci E; Zappa M
    Br J Cancer; 2003 Nov; 89(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 14583763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
    James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study.
    Khoo LA; Taylor P; Given-Wilson RM
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 16244252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a proficiency test of screening mammography.
    Ciatto S; Brancato B; Rosselli Del Turco M; Risso G; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Bricolo D; Zappa M
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12951552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
    Gilbert FJ; Astley SM; Gillan MG; Agbaje OF; Wallis MG; James J; Boggis CR; Duffy SW;
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Oct; 359(16):1675-84. PubMed ID: 18832239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader at screening mammography lowers recall rate but not the cancer detection rate and sensitivity at blinded and non-blinded double reading.
    Klompenhouwer EG; Weber RJ; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; Broeders MJ; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 26117723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.
    Gilbert FJ; Astley SM; McGee MA; Gillan MG; Boggis CR; Griffiths PM; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 16990670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single reading with computer-aided detection performed by selected radiologists in a breast cancer screening program.
    Bargalló X; Santamaría G; Del Amo M; Arguis P; Ríos J; Grau J; Burrel M; Cores E; Velasco M
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 83(11):2019-23. PubMed ID: 25193778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study.
    Guerriero C; Gillan MG; Cairns J; Wallis MG; Gilbert FJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 Jan; 11():11. PubMed ID: 21241473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate.
    Taylor P; Potts HW
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 44(6):798-807. PubMed ID: 18353630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?
    James JJ; Cornford EJ
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19070697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.