99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18356455)
1. Use of perfluorocarbon compound in the endorectal coil to improve MR spectroscopy of the prostate.
Choi H; Ma J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):1055-9. PubMed ID: 18356455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3T MR of the prostate: reducing susceptibility gradients by inflating the endorectal coil with a barium sulfate suspension.
Rosen Y; Bloch BN; Lenkinski RE; Greenman RL; Marquis RP; Rofsky NM
Magn Reson Med; 2007 May; 57(5):898-904. PubMed ID: 17457870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proton two-dimensional chemical shift imaging for evaluation of prostate cancer: external surface coil vs. endorectal surface coil.
Kaji Y; Wada A; Imaoka I; Matsuo M; Terachi T; Kobashi Y; Sugimura K; Fujii M; Maruyama K; Takizawa O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):697-706. PubMed ID: 12451583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Staging and tissue characterization of prostate carcinoma: role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopy].
Sugimura K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2000 Nov; 46(11):855-9. PubMed ID: 11193312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical comparison of rigid and inflatable endorectal-coil probes for MRI and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) of the prostate.
Noworolski SM; Crane JC; Vigneron DB; Kurhanewicz J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18407539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Schiebler ML; Schnall MD; Pollack HM; Lenkinski RE; Tomaszewski JE; Wein AJ; Whittington R; Rauschning W; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 8210358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma. Comparison with histologic macrosections in 40 cases].
Torricelli P; Iadanza M; De Santis M; Pollastri CA; Cesinaro AM; Trentini G; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 1999 Jun; 97(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 10478207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. (31) P MR spectroscopic imaging combined with (1) H MR spectroscopic imaging in the human prostate using a double tuned endorectal coil at 7T.
Luttje MP; Italiaander MG; Arteaga de Castro CS; van der Kemp WJ; Luijten PR; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA; Klomp DW
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 24357271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.
Chen M; Hricak H; Kalbhen CL; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Weiss JM; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 8615261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined MRI and MRS in prostate cancer: improvement of spectral quality by susceptibility matching.
Scheidler J; Vogel M; Gross P; Heuck A
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 19353482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 1.5tesla with endorectal coil versus 3.0tesla without endorectal coil: comparison of spectral quality.
De Visschere P; Nezzo M; Pattyn E; Fonteyne V; Van Praet C; Villeirs G
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 25735448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla.
Sosna J; Pedrosa I; Dewolf WC; Mahallati H; Lenkinski RE; Rofsky NM
Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):857-62. PubMed ID: 15354305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with and without an endorectal coil: a prostate phantom study.
Ma C; Chen L; Scheenen TW; Lu J; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1342-9. PubMed ID: 25348479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?
Latchamsetty KC; Borden LS; Porter CR; Lacrampe M; Vaughan M; Lin E; Conti N; Wright JL; Corman JM
Can J Urol; 2007 Feb; 14(1):3429-34. PubMed ID: 17324322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of endorectal magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in two different Gleason scores in prostate cancer.
Nagarajan R; Margolis D; McClure T; Raman S; Thomas MA
Med Princ Pract; 2011; 20(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 21757934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined use of diffusion-weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection.
Reinsberg SA; Payne GS; Riches SF; Ashley S; Brewster JM; Morgan VA; deSouza NM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 17179350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology.
Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Barentsz JO
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):845-52. PubMed ID: 8610561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the prostate at 3.0T with external phased array coil - preliminary results.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Bastian PJ; Gieseke J; Träber F; Kuhl CK; Wattjes MP; Müller SC; Schild HH
Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jun; 13(6):287-91. PubMed ID: 18558555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
