760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18358883)
1. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mason R; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19720211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Gross R; McCartney M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1021-4. PubMed ID: 17931925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for combination labial plus lingual infiltrations versus labial infiltration in the mandibular lateral incisor.
Nuzum FM; Drum M; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):952-6. PubMed ID: 20478446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mikesell A; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18215665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars.
Corbett IP; Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18436027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Jain A; Kabi D
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):925-9. PubMed ID: 19567309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltration anesthesia.
Vähätalo K; Antila H; Lehtinen R
Anesth Prog; 1993; 40(4):114-6. PubMed ID: 7943919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.
Costa CG; Tortamano IP; Rocha RG; Francischone CE; Tortamano N
Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 15887505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.
Batista da Silva C; Berto LA; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Motta RH; Ranali J; Groppo FC
J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):438-41. PubMed ID: 20171359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block.
Berberich G; Reader A; Drum M; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1498-504. PubMed ID: 19840637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Katz S; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
Anesth Prog; 2010; 57(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 20553134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anesthetic efficacy of the Gow-Gates injection and maxillary infiltration with articaine and lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis.
Sherman MG; Flax M; Namerow K; Murray PE
J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):656-9. PubMed ID: 18498883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
