These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1835889)

  • 1. The likelihood ratio test for the two-component normal mixture problem: power and sample size analysis.
    Mendell NR; Thode HC; Finch SJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):1143-8. PubMed ID: 1835889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Where is the likelihood ratio test powerful for detecting two component normal mixtures?
    Mendell NR; Finch SJ; Thode HC
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):907-15. PubMed ID: 8241377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulated percentage points for the null distribution of the likelihood ratio test for a mixture of two normals.
    Thode HC; Finch SJ; Mendell NR
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1195-201. PubMed ID: 3233255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample Size Requirements of a Mixture Analysis Method with Applications in Systematic Biology.
    Muñoz MA; Acuña JD
    J Theor Biol; 1999 Jan; 196(2):263-265. PubMed ID: 10049619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permutation tests for detecting and estimating mixtures in task performance within groups.
    Lo Y; Matthysse S; Rubin DB; Holzman PS
    Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1937-53. PubMed ID: 12111898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias in misspecified mixtures.
    Gray G
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 8068845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of the mixing proportion in a mixture of two normal distributions from simple, rapid measurements.
    James IR
    Biometrics; 1978 Jun; 34(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 667273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mixture-model classification in DNA content analysis.
    Wang H; Huang S
    Cytometry A; 2007 Sep; 71(9):716-23. PubMed ID: 17654654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.
    Dominicus A; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK; Pedersen NL; Palmgren J
    Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16474914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36.
    Walters SJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 May; 2():26. PubMed ID: 15161494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihoods and TDT for the case-parents design.
    Schaid DJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(3):250-60. PubMed ID: 10096688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.