BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18358901)

  • 1. Impact of Er,Cr:YSGG laser therapy on the cleanliness of the root canal walls of primary teeth.
    Soares F; Varella CH; Pileggi R; Adewumi A; Guelmann M
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 18358901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars.
    Silva LA; Leonardo MR; Nelson-Filho P; Tanomaru JM
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 15272656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Tabrez TA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 26950816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.
    Azar MR; Mokhtare M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):363. PubMed ID: 21891918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cleaning and shaping the root canal with a Nd:YAG laser beam: a comparative study.
    Levy G
    J Endod; 1992 Mar; 18(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 19186433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars.
    Pinheiro SL; Araujo G; Bincelli I; Cunha R; Bueno C
    Int Endod J; 2012 Apr; 45(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 22188162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.
    Khademi A; Yazdizadeh M; Feizianfard M
    J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 16631839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of smear layer: a comparison of automated image analysis versus expert observers.
    George R; Rutley EB; Walsh LJ
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):999-1002. PubMed ID: 18634934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of permeability and morphology of root canal dentin after Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation.
    Silva AC; Guglielmi C; Meneguzzo DT; Aranha AC; Bombana AC; de Paula Eduardo C
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2010 Feb; 28(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 19764896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals.
    Schäfer E; Zapke K
    J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls.
    Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
    J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bactericidal efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation against Enterococcus faecalis compared with NaOCl irrigation: an ex vivo pilot study.
    Eldeniz AU; Ozer F; Hadimli HH; Erganis O
    Int Endod J; 2007 Feb; 40(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 17229116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research on the effect of root canal seal achieved by irradiation of Er, Cr:YSGG laser].
    Yu JT; Wang XD; Bao MR; Yan L
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Feb; 13(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 15007476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.