These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Issues in medical malpractice XVII. Tan SY Hawaii Med J; 2007 Nov; 66(11):305-6. PubMed ID: 18065121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Practice parameters: malpractice liability considerations for physicians. Bierig JR; Hirshfeld EB; Kelly JT; Raskin RD Leg Med; 1991; ():207-25. PubMed ID: 1821893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Internet listservers and pediatrics: newly emerging legal and clinical practice issues. II. De Ville KA Pediatrics; 1996 Sep; 98(3 Pt 1):453-4. PubMed ID: 8784373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Practice parameters as a shield against physician liability. Kuc GW J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():439-68. PubMed ID: 10134814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Expanding HMO liability: ethical, but not the point. La Puma J Manag Care; 1999 Nov; 8(11):66-7. PubMed ID: 10977325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prescribing black box drugs: how to watch for liability traps. Knothe BD Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 90(24):56. PubMed ID: 25211812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Top 10 risk areas for physician practices. Miscoe MD J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 24(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 19146081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 2009 General Assembly: looking forward. Holloway T Mo Med; 2008; 105(6):462-5. PubMed ID: 19052005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The flaws in state 'apology' and 'disclosure' laws dilute their intended impact on malpractice suits. Mastroianni AC; Mello MM; Sommer S; Hardy M; Gallagher TH Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Sep; 29(9):1611-9. PubMed ID: 20820016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Telepsychiatry: critical dimensions for forensic services. Miller TW; Burton DC; Hill K; Luftman G; Veltkemp LJ; Swope M J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 16394233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A year in review--legal developments and trends. Loomis C J Okla State Med Assoc; 2003 Dec; 96(12):585-7. PubMed ID: 14965031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Infected judgment: legal responses to physician bias. Crossley M Villanova Law Rev; 2003; 48(1):195-303. PubMed ID: 15732211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal issues in the management of patients with diabetes mellitus. Lee SM; Sum CF; Koh D Singapore Med J; 2009 Dec; 50(12):1200-6; quiz 1207. PubMed ID: 20087558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The second revolution in informed consent: comparing physicians to each other. Twerski AD; Cohen NB Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 12455555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Defending the use of EBM and shared decision making. Alper BS; Hoock JL Am Fam Physician; 2005 Apr; 71(7):1261-2. PubMed ID: 15832529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liability and allied health professionals. Whose risk is it anyway? Midwest Medical Insurance Company, Risk Management Committee. Minn Med; 1996 Sep; 79(9):29-31. PubMed ID: 8854668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Change in the contract physician regulation--greater employment freedom for the established radiologist?]. Wigge P; Linnemann SC Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):847-8. PubMed ID: 18726860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The liquidation of PIC and PIE: what physicians need to know. Metz EB Pa Med; 1998 Jun; 101(6):14. PubMed ID: 9650489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]