These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18359988)

  • 1. Exploring the potential of membrane bioreactors to enhance metals removal from wastewater: pilot experiences.
    Fatone F; Eusebi AL; Pavan P; Battistoni P
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 18359988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of constructed wetland for the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater.
    Khan S; Ahmad I; Shah MT; Rehman S; Khaliq A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3451-7. PubMed ID: 19535201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of a membrane bioreactor used for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with heavy metals.
    Katsou E; Malamis S; Loizidou M
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Mar; 102(6):4325-32. PubMed ID: 21269823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility study to upgrade a textile wastewater treatment plant by a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor for effluent reuse.
    Malpei F; Bonomo L; Rozzi A
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(10):33-9. PubMed ID: 12862214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heavy metal removal from wastewater and leachate co-treatment sludge by sulfur oxidizing bacteria.
    Aralp LC; Erdincler A; Onay TT
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(10):53-8. PubMed ID: 11794681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in large wastewater treatment plants treating municipal and industrial wastewaters.
    Carletti G; Fatone F; Bolzonella D; Cecchi F; Carletti G
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18495995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Start-up procedures and analysis of heavy metals inhibition on methanogenic activity in EGSB reactor.
    Colussi I; Cortesi A; Della Vedova L; Gallo V; Robles FK
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6290-4. PubMed ID: 19679466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low dose powdered activated carbon addition at high sludge retention times to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors.
    Remy M; van der Marel P; Zwijnenburg A; Rulkens W; Temmink H
    Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 19010512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cu and Cr(III)) removal from water in Malaysia: post treatment by high quality limestone.
    Aziz HA; Adlan MN; Ariffin KS
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Apr; 99(6):1578-83. PubMed ID: 17540556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
    González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
    Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Membranebioreactor with external membranes.
    Jonkers C; Carrette R; De Lathouwer J; Thoeye C
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):87-93. PubMed ID: 15954567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined effects of cadmium and zinc on both sequencing batch reactor and continuous activated sludge.
    Sorour MT; Sayed-Ahmed AM
    Environ Technol; 2005 Sep; 26(9):963-74. PubMed ID: 16196405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance comparison of a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor and a full-scale sequencing batch reactor with sand filtration: treatment of low strength wastewater from a northern Canadian Aboriginal Community.
    Frederickson K; Cicek N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):483-90. PubMed ID: 16004011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technological transfer to demonstrative scale of sequencing batch biofilter granular reactor (SBBGR) technology for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment.
    Di Iaconi C; De Sanctis M; Rossetti S; Ramadori R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(2):367-72. PubMed ID: 18701787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants.
    Clara M; Strenn B; Gans O; Martinez E; Kreuzinger N; Kroiss H
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4797-807. PubMed ID: 16242170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal turbidity and separation of heavy metals using electrocoagulation-electroflotation technique A case study.
    Merzouk B; Gourich B; Sekki A; Madani K; Chibane M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 May; 164(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 18799259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance evaluation of various aerobic biological systems for the treatment of domestic wastewater at low temperatures.
    Sundaresan N; Philip L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(4):819-30. PubMed ID: 18776617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toxicity removal efficiency of decentralised sequencing batch reactor and ultra-filtration membrane bioreactors.
    Libralato G; Volpi Ghirardini A; Avezzù F
    Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4437-50. PubMed ID: 20619431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review.
    Santos A; Judd S
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 20082004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Baffled membrane bioreactor (BMBR) for efficient nutrient removal from municipal wastewater.
    Kimura K; Nishisako R; Miyoshi T; Shimada R; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):625-32. PubMed ID: 17919677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.