173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18359996)
1. Membrane bioreactor aeration: investigation of the velocity flow pattern.
Tacke D; Pinnekamp J; Prieske H; Kraume M
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 18359996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fouling and its reversibility in relation to flow properties and module design in aerated hollow fibre modules for membrane bioreactors.
Pollet S; Guigui C; Cabassud C
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(4):629-36. PubMed ID: 18360006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of innovative operation concept for flat sheet MBR filtration system.
Weinrich L; Grélot A
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 18360004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of different mesh filter module configurations on effluent quality and long-term filtration performance.
Loderer C; Wörle A; Fuchs W
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 46(7):3844-50. PubMed ID: 22390461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Package plant of extended aeration membrane bioreactors: a study on aeration intensity and biofouling control.
Ujang Z; Ng SS; Nagaoka H
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(10):335-42. PubMed ID: 16104438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater.
Nywening JP; Zhou H
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(14):3548-58. PubMed ID: 19501871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of a membrane bioreactor with glass fiber flat grille modules and the modules' optimization based on the local critical flux theory.
Yuan D; Fan Y; Yu Y; Xu G; Yang W; Wu G
Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):997-1005. PubMed ID: 19913276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Specific energy consumption of membrane bioreactor (MBR) for sewage treatment.
Krzeminski P; van der Graaf JH; van Lier JB
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):380-92. PubMed ID: 22233918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knowledge-based system for automatic MBR control.
Comas J; Meabe E; Sancho L; Ferrero G; Sipma J; Monclús H; Rodriguez-Roda I
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(12):2829-36. PubMed ID: 21123912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modular operation of membrane bioreactors for higher hydraulic capacity utilisation.
Veltmann K; Palmowski LM; Pinnekamp J
Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 21436563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of membrane bioreactor performance via residence time distribution: effects of membrane configuration and mixing.
Wang Y; Ong KW; Brannock MW; Leslie GL
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 18309212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation.
Brannock M; Wang Y; Leslie G
Water Res; 2010 May; 44(10):3181-91. PubMed ID: 20347471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review on the state of science on membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.
van Nieuwenhuijzen AF; Evenblij H; Uijterlinde CA; Schulting FL
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(7):979-86. PubMed ID: 18441422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cost of a package plant membrane bioreactor.
Fletcher H; Mackley T; Judd S
Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2627-35. PubMed ID: 17467771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BSM-MBR: a benchmark simulation model to compare control and operational strategies for membrane bioreactors.
Maere T; Verrecht B; Moerenhout S; Judd S; Nopens I
Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2181-90. PubMed ID: 21329957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of chemical cleaning and air-sparging on the critical and sustainable flux in a flat sheet membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
Guglielmi G; Chiarani D; Saroj DP; Andreottola G
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(12):1873-9. PubMed ID: 18587173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal of ibuprofen from wastewater: comparing biodegradation in conventional, membrane bioreactor, and biological nutrient removal treatment systems.
Smook TM; Zho H; Zytner RG
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18192734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational study on microscale behavior of bubble generated by aeration in a plug-flow aeration tank.
Wang H; Li Y; Zhao Z
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(10):2065-72. PubMed ID: 19474502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale.
Guglielmi G; Andreottola G; Foladori P; Ziglio G
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1201-7. PubMed ID: 19717906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of aeration patterns on the flow field in wastewater aeration tanks.
Gresch M; Armbruster M; Braun D; Gujer W
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):810-8. PubMed ID: 20932546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
