322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18360103)
21. [Maxillofacial 3-dimensional morphological analysis for patients with Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry].
Pan S; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Han M
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Feb; 19(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 20300684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Cassidy SE; Jackson SR; Turpin DL; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
You KH; Lee KJ; Lee SH; Baik HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):540.e1-8; discussion 540-1. PubMed ID: 21055584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of buccolingual inclination of posterior teeth in different facial patterns using computed tomography.
Mitra S; Ravi MS
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 22048574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patients with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography.
Baek SH; Cho IS; Chang YI; Kim MJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Nov; 104(5):628-39. PubMed ID: 17656131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography.
Kwon TG; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15925488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of buccal and lingual alveolar bone thickness and buccolingual inclination of maxillary posterior teeth in patients with severe skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Hu X; Huang X; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):503-515. PubMed ID: 32241357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Morphologic relationship between the cranial base and the mandible in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
Kim SJ; Lee KJ; Lee SH; Baik HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 23992805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relationship between maxillofacial morphology and morphological characteristics of vertical sections of the mandible obtained by CT scanning.
Kohakura S; Kasai K; Ohno I; Kanazawa E
J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1997 Jun; 39(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 9293703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An experimental study of arch perimeter and arch width increase with mandibular expansion: a finite element method.
Baswaraj ; Hemanth M; Jayasudha ; Patil C; Sunilkumar P; Raghuveer HP; Chandralekha B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 23579904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between transverse dental anomalies and skeletal asymmetry.
Kusayama M; Motohashi N; Kuroda T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 12637905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correction of facial asymmetry and maxillary canting with corticotomy and 1-jaw orthognathic surgery.
Ahn HW; Seo DH; Kim SH; Lee BS; Chung KR; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 25432261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three-dimensional analysis of molar compensation in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism.
Tyan S; Park HS; Janchivdorj M; Han SH; Kim SJ; Ahn HW
Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 26192894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation.
Lin H; Zhu P; Lin Q; Huang X; Xu Y; Yang X
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161601. PubMed ID: 27571364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the mandibular hinge axis in adult patients with facial asymmetry with and without posterior unilateral crossbite.
Takada J; Miyamoto JJ; Yokota T; Ono T; Moriyama K
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25150274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Features in subjects with the frontal occlusal plane inclined toward the contralateral side of the mandibular deviation.
Uesugi S; Yonemitsu I; Kokai S; Takei M; Omura S; Ono T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 26718377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of dental compensation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim HJ; Hong M; Park HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 31582121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
