319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18360103)
41. Asymmetry in the condylar long axis and first molar rotation.
Kanomi R; Hidaka O; Yamada C; Takada K
J Dent Res; 2004 Feb; 83(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 14742646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry.
Good S; Edler R; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16431897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery.
Kim DS; Huh KH; Lee SS; Heo MS; Choi SC; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 23465640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Three-dimensional analyses of facial soft tissue configuration of Japanese females with jaw deformity--a trial of polygonal view of facial soft tissue deformity in orthognathic patients.
Shimomatsu K; Nozoe E; Ishihata K; Okawachi T; Nakamura N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 40(7):559-67. PubMed ID: 22078498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Mandibular asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion.
Kurt G; Uysal T; Sisman Y; Ramoglu SI
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 18193958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Relationships between jaw deformity and the occlusal plane in cone beam computed tomography scans.
Teng C; Zhong T; Yu Q
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 33546859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The three-dimensional morphology of mandible and glenoid fossa as contributing factors to menton deviation in facial asymmetry-retrospective study.
Oh MH; Cho JH
Prog Orthod; 2020 Sep; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 32959138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness?
Lee ST; Mori Y; Minami K; An CH; Park JW; Kwon TG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1577-87. PubMed ID: 23800674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Three-dimensional evaluation of molar buccolingual inclinations after orthodontic treatment using edgewise mechanics.
Billings B; Helms L; Kula K; Utreja A; Eckert G; Ghoneima A
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):529-542. PubMed ID: 28803805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.
Kwon TG; Lee KH; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Kim HJ; Lee SH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1538-43. PubMed ID: 17656280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Protraction of mandibular second and third molars assisted by partial corticision and miniscrew anchorage.
Mimura H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 23910209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion.
Shu R; Han X; Wang Y; Xu H; Ai D; Wang L; Wu Y; Bai D
Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 23458279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Robust and regional 3D facial asymmetry assessment in hemimandibular hyperplasia and hemimandibular elongation anomalies.
Walters M; Claes P; Kakulas E; Clement JG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22749574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry: an analysis using computed tomography.
Yáñez-Vico RM; Iglesias-Linares A; Torres-Lagares D; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL; Solano-Reina E
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):729-36. PubMed ID: 20632049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Mandibular asymmetry: determination of a reliable skin measurement technique].
Martin C; Bouletreau P; Cresseaux P; Lucas R; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2018 Jun; 89(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 30040619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Dental arch characteristics of the facial asymmetry].
Jia HC; Sun XH
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 23(5):412-4, 437. PubMed ID: 16285549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.
Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of mandibular contour in patients with significant facial asymmetry.
Fang JJ; Tu YH; Wong TY; Liu JK; Zhang YX; Leong IF; Chen KC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 45(7):922-31. PubMed ID: 26976218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Three-dimensional cephalometry: applications in clinical practice and research].
Faure J; Oueiss A; Marchal-Sixou C; Braga J; Treil J
Orthod Fr; 2008 Mar; 79(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 18364213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
