513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18360282)
1. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.
Kronz JD; Westra WH; Epstein JI
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2426-35. PubMed ID: 10590387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patterns of second-opinion diagnosis in oral and maxillofacial pathology.
Jones K; Jordan RC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):865-9. PubMed ID: 20304686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandatory second opinion in cytopathology.
Lueck N; Jensen C; Cohen MB; Weydert JA
Cancer; 2009 Apr; 117(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 19466754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of first-opinion and second-opinion histopathology from dogs and cats with cancer: 430 cases (2001-2008).
Regan RC; Rassnick KM; Balkman CE; Bailey DB; McDonough SP
Vet Comp Oncol; 2010 Mar; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20230576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring the value of review of pathology material by a second pathologist.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 May; 125(5):737-9. PubMed ID: 16707375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis.
Hamady ZZ; Mather N; Lansdown MR; Davidson L; Maclennan KA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 31(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15642429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of second opinion in surgical pathology referral material of lymphoma.
Al-Maghrabi JA; Sayadi HH
Saudi Med J; 2012 Apr; 33(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 22485235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outside case review of surgical pathology for referred patients: the impact on patient care.
Swapp RE; Aubry MC; Salomão DR; Cheville JC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 22775269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying the value of in-house consultation in surgical pathology.
Renshaw AA; Pinnar NE; Jiroutek MR; Young ML
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 May; 117(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 12090424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
Safrin RE; Bark CJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical impact of second opinion in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): A study of 922 interinstitutional consultations.
Bajaj J; Morgenstern N; Sugrue C; Wasserman J; Wasserman P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 May; 40(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 21964957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Second opinion and discrepancy in the diagnosis of soft tissue lesions at surgical pathology.
Sharif MA; Hamdani SN
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 20699503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should pathologists send all or only selected slides for patient-requested interlaboratory second opinion?
Renshaw MA; Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 132(5):763-6. PubMed ID: 19846819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Aug; 140(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 23897257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
