514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18360282)
21. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology.
Silverman JF
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
Raab SS
Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):849-63. PubMed ID: 15555746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Second opinion pathology in liver biopsy interpretation.
Bejarano PA; Koehler A; Sherman KE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Nov; 96(11):3158-64. PubMed ID: 11721765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Revisiting old slides--how worthwhile is it?
Agarwal S; Wadhwa N
Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Jun; 206(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 20188486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outside slide review in gynecologic oncology: impact on patient care and treatment.
Eskander RN; Baruah J; Nayak R; Brueseke T; Ji T; Wardeh R; Tewari KS
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 May; 32(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 23518913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anatomic pathology and patient safety: it's not an error: it's a diagnostic misadventure!
Grzybicki DM; Raab SS; Janosky JE; Vrbin-Turcsanyi C; Bruno S; Zarbo RJ; Stone CH; Meier FA; Geisinger KR; Gavin AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 129(1):167-8; author reply 169. PubMed ID: 18183670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Discrepancy between second and first opinion in surgical oncological patients.
Mellink WA; Henzen-Logmans SC; Bongaerts AH; Ooijen BV; Rodenburg CJ; Wiggers TH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Feb; 32(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 16303280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of disagreement and error rates for three types of interdepartmental consultations.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec; 124(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 16416737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology.
Zan E; Yousem DM; Carone M; Lewin JS
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 20308451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Institutional pathology consultation.
Tsung JS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Mar; 28(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15104305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changes in breast cancer reports after pathology second opinion.
Marco V; Muntal T; García-Hernandez F; Cortes J; Gonzalez B; Rubio IT
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 24689830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Institutional review of outside cytology materials: a retrospective analysis of two institutions' experiences.
Layfield LJ; Jones C; Rowe L; Gopez EV
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11782087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice.
Owens SR; Wiehagen LT; Kelly SM; Piccoli AL; Lassige K; Yousem SA; Dhir R; Parwani AV
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1319-23. PubMed ID: 20697250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In-house daily consensus conference: an important quality control/quality assurance activity--experience at a major referral center.
Khurshid A; Ahmad Z; Qureshi A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2009; 52(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 19679952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Secondary case review methods and anatomic pathology culture.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):829-31. PubMed ID: 20472838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Discrepancies in dermatopathology diagnoses: the role of second review policies and dermatopathology fellowship training.
Gaudi S; Zarandona JM; Raab SS; English JC; Jukic DM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 22892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Second Opinion Consult Clinic for Surgical Oncology in the Daniel den Hoed Clinic: analysis of the first 245 patients].
Mellink WA; Henzen-Logmans SC; Bongaerts AH; Pruyn JF; van Geel AN; Wiggers T
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Dec; 143(49):2471-5. PubMed ID: 10608986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
