BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18361131)

  • 41. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Inter-rater reliability of the Greek version of CAARMS among two groups of mental health professionals.
    Kollias C; Kontaxakis V; Havaki-Kontaxaki B; Simmons MB; Stefanis N; Papageorgiou C
    Psychiatriki; 2015; 26(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 26480226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Risk assessment and screening for violence.
    Large M; Mullin K
    Eur Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 26(2):132; author reply 133. PubMed ID: 20934309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management Scales (HCR-20) in predicting violence and other offenses in forensic psychiatric patients in Brazil.
    Telles LE; Folino JO; Taborda JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):427-31. PubMed ID: 23021023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression: an instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients.
    Ogloff JR; Daffern M
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):799-813. PubMed ID: 17171770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Severe intimate partner violence risk prediction scale-revised].
    Echeburúa E; Amor PJ; Loinaz I; de Corral P
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):1054-60. PubMed ID: 21044552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A preliminary study of the diagnostic accuracy of the Gerontological Personality disorders Scale (GPS).
    van Alphen SP; Engelen GJ; Kuin Y; Hoijtink HJ; Derksen JJ
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2006 Sep; 21(9):862-8. PubMed ID: 16955455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The application of a violence risk assessment tool among Chinese psychiatric service users: a preliminary study.
    Yao X; Li Z; Arthur D; Hu L; Cheng G
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2012 Jun; 19(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 22073978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting inpatient violence using an extended version of the Brøset-Violence-Checklist: instrument development and clinical application.
    Abderhalden C; Needham I; Dassen T; Halfens R; Haug HJ; Fischer J
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Apr; 6():17. PubMed ID: 16638122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Psychopathy and evaluation of violent behavior in a psychiatric security milieu].
    Pham T; Rémy S; Dailliet A; Lienard L
    Encephale; 1998; 24(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9696908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Introducing a new adolescent psychopathology screen: the High School Personality Questionnaire pathology section.
    Gedeon SW; Schuerger JM
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Dec; 83(3 Pt 2):1257-8. PubMed ID: 10079722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Structured assessments for imminent aggression in mental health and correctional settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dickens GL; O'Shea LE; Christensen M
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Apr; 104():103526. PubMed ID: 32062051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Incremental validity analyses of the violence risk appraisal guide and the psychopathy checklist: screening version in a civil psychiatric sample.
    Edens JF; Skeem JL; Douglas KS
    Assessment; 2006 Sep; 13(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 16880286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample - comparing HCR-20v2 with the female additional manual to the HCR-20v2.
    Strand SJM; Selenius H
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2019; 73(4-5):248-256. PubMed ID: 31081436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychometric properties of the CES-D-10 in a psychiatric sample.
    Björgvinsson T; Kertz SJ; Bigda-Peyton JS; McCoy KL; Aderka IM
    Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 23513010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluating pain, sedation, and delirium in the neurologically critically ill-feasibility and reliability of standardized tools: a multi-institutional study.
    Yu A; Teitelbaum J; Scott J; Gesin G; Russell B; Huynh T; Skrobik Y
    Crit Care Med; 2013 Aug; 41(8):2002-7. PubMed ID: 23863231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Utility of decision support tools for assessing acute risk of violence.
    McNiel DE; Gregory AL; Lam JN; Binder RL; Sullivan GR
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2003 Oct; 71(5):945-53. PubMed ID: 14516243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Occupational Functioning Scale (OFS)--an instrument for assessment of work ability in psychiatric disorders.
    Hannula JA; Lahtela K; Järvikoski A; Salminen JK; Mäkelä P
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2006; 60(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 17050295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Violence and threats of violence within psychiatric care--a comparison of staff and patient experience of the same incident.
    Omérov M; Edman G; Wistedt B
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2004; 58(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 15513613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.