These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18361173)
1. Is fluid filled mattress technology compatible with NICE guidance? Pagnamenta F Br J Community Nurs; 2007 Dec; 12(12):S35-8. PubMed ID: 18361173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pressure ulcers: guideline development and economic modelling. Legood R; McInnes E J Adv Nurs; 2005 May; 50(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 15811110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of pressure ulcers: results of a study comparing evidence and practice. Helberg D; Mertens E; Halfens RJ; Dassen T Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Aug; 52(8):60-72. PubMed ID: 16896239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. A synopsis of the current evidence from research. Cullum N Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2001 Dec; 13(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 11778342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. Benbow M Nurs Stand; 2006 Sep 6-12; 20(52):42-4. PubMed ID: 16989340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers. Colin D; Loyant R; Abraham P; Saumet JL Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8688975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Brown S; Smith IL; Brown JM; Hulme C; McGinnis E; Stubbs N; Nelson EA; Muir D; Rutherford C; Walker K; Henderson V; Wilson L; Gilberts R; Collier H; Fernandez C; Hartley S; Bhogal M; Coleman S; Nixon JE Trials; 2016 Dec; 17(1):604. PubMed ID: 27993145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prevalence, management, equipment provision and outcome for patients with pressure ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district. Vowden KR; Vowden P J Tissue Viability; 2009 Feb; 18(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 19097794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid. Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A static-led approach to pressure ulcers: an evaluation after 3 years. James J Br J Nurs; 2004 Nov 11-24; 13(20):1221-5. PubMed ID: 15580092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prevention of pressure ulcers: retrospective study regarding the effectiveness of an alternate pressure device]. Rasero L; Fabbri C; Cantasano L; Lotti T; Pucci T; Veratti M; Rossi M Prof Inferm; 2007; 60(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 18289496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Provision of alternating air-pressure mattresses in the community. McKeeney L Nurs Times; 2004 Jun 1-7; 100(22):54-6. PubMed ID: 15195548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Principles of alternating pressure surfaces. McLeod AG Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(7):30-6. PubMed ID: 9450404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Materials management and decubitus care. Purchasing for prevention. Stewart TP J Healthc Mater Manage; 1987 Jan; 5(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 10311855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]