These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18361671)

  • 1. Together or apart: when goals and temptations complement versus compete.
    Fishbach A; Zhang Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 18361671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of temptations on the affective salience of weight control goals.
    Palfai TP; Macdonald A
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Mar; 45(3):449-58. PubMed ID: 16712782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference and the specificity of goals.
    Markman AB; Bendl CM; Kim K
    Emotion; 2007 Aug; 7(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 17683224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion.
    Russo JE; Carlson KA; Meloy MG; Yong K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):456-70. PubMed ID: 18729710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-control in action: implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations.
    Fishbach A; Shah JY
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 May; 90(5):820-32. PubMed ID: 16737375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How chocolate keeps you slim. The effect of food temptations on weight watching goal importance, intentions, and eating behavior.
    Kroese FM; Evers C; De Ridder DT
    Appetite; 2009 Dec; 53(3):430-3. PubMed ID: 19666065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-efficacy and resource allocation: support for a nonmonotonic, discontinuous model.
    Vancouver JB; More KM; Yoder RJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 18211133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temptations elicit compensatory intentions.
    Kronick I; Knäuper B
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):398-401. PubMed ID: 20043965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 9316260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How liked and disliked foods affect time perception.
    Gil S; Rousset S; Droit-Volet S
    Emotion; 2009 Aug; 9(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 19653766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking chances in the face of threat: romantic risk regulation and approach motivation.
    Cavallo JV; Fitzsimons GM; Holmes JG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):737-51. PubMed ID: 19307432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent.
    Bamford S; Ward R
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18410191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Food preference, keeper ratings, and reinforcer effectiveness in exotic animals: the value of systematic testing.
    Gaalema DE; Perdue BM; Kelling AS
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2011; 14(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 21191846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Academic goals, cognitive and self-regulatory strategies].
    Valle A; Cabanach RG; Rodríguez S; Núñez JC; González-Pienda JA
    Psicothema; 2006 May; 18(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17296027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Psychological features of the level of pretension in goal choice in psychopathy].
    Bratus' BS
    Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1976 Dec; 76(12):1825-8. PubMed ID: 1015118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Categorization reduces the effect of context on hedonic preference.
    Zellner DA; Mattingly MC; Parker S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1228-32. PubMed ID: 19633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impressions of functional food consumers.
    Saher M; Arvola A; Lindeman M; Lähteenmäki L
    Appetite; 2004 Feb; 42(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15036786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resting on laurels: the effects of discrete progress markers as subgoals on task performance and preferences.
    Amir O; Ariely D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1158-71. PubMed ID: 18763898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When mere action versus inaction leads to robust preference change.
    Chen Z; Holland RW; Quandt J; Dijksterhuis A; Veling H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 117(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30920280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of expectancies in accepting task-related diversity: do disappointment and lack of commitment stem from actual differences or violated expectations?
    Rink F; Ellemers N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jun; 33(6):842-54. PubMed ID: 17478611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.