349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18361673)
1. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preparing for novel versus familiar events: shifts in global and local processing.
Förster J; Liberman N; Shapira O
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):383-99. PubMed ID: 19653797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: how global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity.
Förster J
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):88-111. PubMed ID: 19203171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gender differences in global-local perception? Evidence from orientation and shape judgments.
Kimchi R; Amishav R; Sulitzeanu-Kenan A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 19019319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymmetries in visual-spatial processing following childhood stroke.
Schatz J; Craft S; Koby M; DeBaun MR
Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 15099156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast effects in priming paradigms: Implications for theory and research on implicit attitudes.
Scherer LD; Lambert AJ
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 97(3):383-403. PubMed ID: 19685997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus.
Förster J; Tory Higgins E
Psychol Sci; 2005 Aug; 16(8):631-6. PubMed ID: 16102066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: implications for pathology.
Lux S; Marshall JC; Thimm M; Fink GR
Cortex; 2008 Jan; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 18387528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of local and global processing in the recognition of living and nonliving things.
Thomas R; Forde E
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):982-6. PubMed ID: 16253294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm.
Hayes BK; McKinnon R; Sweller N
Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1430-41. PubMed ID: 18793074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts.
Brockmole JR; Castelhano MS; Henderson JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):699-706. PubMed ID: 16822141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of information localization in scene gist recognition.
Loschky LC; Sethi A; Simons DJ; Pydimarri TN; Ochs D; Corbeille JL
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1431-50. PubMed ID: 18085955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production.
Zotov V; Jones MN; Mewhort DJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):621-39. PubMed ID: 21264728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implicit identification of irrelevant local objects interacts with global/local processing of hierarchical stimuli.
Poirel N; Pineau A; Mellet E
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):321-36. PubMed ID: 16574048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of interference and retention delay on temporal generalization performance.
Rattat AC; Droit-Volet S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1903-12. PubMed ID: 20952787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of accessibility and subjective relevance on the use of piecemeal and category information in impression formation.
Köpetz C; Kruglanski AW
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):692-705. PubMed ID: 18308925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When the association between appearance and outcome contaminates social judgment: a bidirectional model linking group homogeneity and collective treatment.
Alter AL; Darley JM
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):776-95. PubMed ID: 19857001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task].
Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D
Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
Topolinski S; Strack F
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local and global processing: observations from a remote culture.
Davidoff J; Fonteneau E; Fagot J
Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):702-9. PubMed ID: 18662813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
