These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18361768)
1. Is there enhanced lymphatic function in upper body trained females? Dolan LB; Lane KN; McKenzie DC Lymphat Res Biol; 2008; 6(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 18361768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate the effect of high versus low intensity upper body dynamic exercise on lymphatic function in healthy females. Lane K; Dolan L; Worsley D; McKenzie D Lymphat Res Biol; 2006; 4(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 17034296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate the effects of upper body dynamic exercise and handgrip exercise on radiopharmaceutical clearance from hands of healthy females. Lane K; Worsley D; McKenzie D Lymphat Res Biol; 2005; 3(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15770082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Upper extremity lymphatic function at rest and during exercise in breast cancer survivors with and without lymphedema compared with healthy controls. Lane KN; Dolan LB; Worsley D; McKenzie DC J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 Sep; 103(3):917-25. PubMed ID: 17585046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Arm crank ergometer is reliable and valid for measuring aerobic capacity during submaximal exercise. Bulthuis Y; Drossaers-Bakker W; Oosterveld F; van der Palen J; van de Laar M J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Oct; 24(10):2809-15. PubMed ID: 20885199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What maintains energy supply at peak aerobic exercise in trained and untrained older men? Sagiv M; Goldhammer E; Ben-Sira D; Amir R Gerontology; 2007; 53(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 17622751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of combined active recovery from supramaximal exercise on blood lactate disappearance in trained and untrained man. Gmada N; Bouhlel E; Mrizak I; Debabi H; Ben Jabrallah M; Tabka Z; Feki Y; Amri M Int J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 26(10):874-9. PubMed ID: 16320173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of one-arm crank ergometry in the prediction of upper body aerobic capacity. Birkett WA; Edwards DF Clin Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 12(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 9744667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry. Price MJ; Bottoms L; Smith PM; Nicholettos A J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 21154011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human lymphatic pumping measured in healthy and lymphoedematous arms by lymphatic congestion lymphoscintigraphy. Modi S; Stanton AW; Svensson WE; Peters AM; Mortimer PS; Levick JR J Physiol; 2007 Aug; 583(Pt 1):271-85. PubMed ID: 17569739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of upper- and lower-limb exercise training on cardiovascular function and walking distances in patients with intermittent claudication. Walker RD; Nawaz S; Wilkinson CH; Saxton JM; Pockley AG; Wood RF J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 10753273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of crank configuration on muscle activity and torque production during arm crank ergometry. Smith PM; Chapman ML; Hazlehurst KE; Goss-Sampson MA J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 17337211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thermoregulatory responses of paraplegic and able-bodied athletes at rest and during prolonged upper body exercise and passive recovery. Price MJ; Campbell IG Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1997; 76(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 9404868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ankle to arm index following maximal exercise in normal subjects and athletes. Desvaux B; Abraham P; Colin D; Leftheriotis G; Saumet JL Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1996 Jul; 28(7):836-9. PubMed ID: 8832537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of maximal and submaximal arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry on postural sway. Hill MW; Goss-Sampson M; Duncan MJ; Price MJ Eur J Sport Sci; 2014; 14(8):782-90. PubMed ID: 24707964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry. Mossberg K; Willman C; Topor MA; Crook H; Patak S Spinal Cord; 1999 Aug; 37(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 10455533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiorespiratory responses to maximal arm and leg exercise in national-class marathon runners. deJong AT; Bonzheim K; Franklin BA; Saltarelli W Phys Sportsmed; 2009 Jun; 37(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 20048518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of training on cardiovascular responses to arm exercise in individuals with tetraplegia. Hopman MT; Dallmeijer AJ; Snoek G; van der Woude LH Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 74(1-2):172-9. PubMed ID: 8891516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry. Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ J Sports Sci; 2007 Apr; 25(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 17454538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry. Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Donnelly MS; Martz WP; Robertson RJ Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Aug; 78(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9721003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]