84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18362483)
1. Biopsy-derived Gleason artifact and prostate volume: experience using ten samples in larger prostates.
Sciarra A; Autran Gomez A; Salciccia S; Dattilo C; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Di Silverio F
Urol Int; 2008; 80(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 18362483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of prostate volume on tumor grade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in the era of extended prostatic biopsies.
Kassouf W; Nakanishi H; Ochiai A; Babaian KN; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 17499289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extended pattern prostate biopsy does not minimize the volume-grade bias in prostate cancer detection.
Al-Ghamdi AM; Lockwood G; Toi A; Kulkarni GS; Evans A; Finelli A; Zlotta AR; Fleshner N
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1332-4. PubMed ID: 18289588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.
Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ
BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 21895937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors?
Chan TY; Chan DY; Stutzman KL; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2181-4. PubMed ID: 11696731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7.
Serkin FB; Soderdahl DW; Cullen J; Chen Y; Hernandez J
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19117774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice.
Moreira Leite KR; Camara-Lopes LH; Dall'Oglio MF; Cury J; Antunes AA; Sañudo A; Srougi M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):353-6. PubMed ID: 18774658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small transrectal ultrasound volume predicts clinically significant Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.
Turley RS; Hamilton RJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Freedland SJ;
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):523-7; discussion 527-8. PubMed ID: 18076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score?
Mir MC; Planas J; Raventos CX; de Torres IM; Trilla E; Cecchini L; Orsola A; Morote J
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):563-5. PubMed ID: 18476971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
