BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

520 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18362721)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of a new technique of mandibular angle fractures: biplanar and bicortical superior proximal 3 holes and bicortical inferior plate fixation.
    Turgut G; Kayali MU; Soydan AT; Gündüz O; Salman S; Oktar F; Baş L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 18362721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
    Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures.
    Alkan A; Celebi N; Ozden B; Baş B; Inal S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):752-6. PubMed ID: 17651992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Experimental studies of the biomechanical stability of different miniplate configurations for the mandibular angle].
    Schierle HP; Schmelzeisen R; Rahn B
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():166-70. PubMed ID: 8755434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of miniplate fixation techniques for fractures of the atrophic edentulous mandible.
    Choi BH; Huh JY; Suh CH; Kim KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 15695047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures: a comparison of 2 techniques.
    Mehra P; Murad H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2254-60. PubMed ID: 18940489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.
    Esen A; Dolanmaz D; Tüz HH
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 22118919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
    Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.
    Haug RH; Fattahi TT; Goltz M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 59(10):1199-210. PubMed ID: 11573182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis.
    Arbag H; Korkmaz HH; Ozturk K; Uyar Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18486788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
    Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a single noncompression miniplate versus 2 noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Danda AK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1565-7. PubMed ID: 20430504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A clinical investigation on miniplate fixation as tension band for mandibular angle fracture].
    Zhang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Sep; 35(5):340-2. PubMed ID: 11780238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques.
    Dennis MG; Simon JA; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; DiCesare PE
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 10884215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical analysis of mandibular angle fractures.
    Kimsal J; Baack B; Candelaria L; Khraishi T; Lovald S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 69(12):3010-4. PubMed ID: 21496988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical analysis of miniplate osteosynthesis for fractures of the atrophic mandible.
    Sugiura T; Yamamoto K; Murakami K; Kawakami M; Kang YB; Tsutsumi S; Kirita T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2397-403. PubMed ID: 19837308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new biomechanical model for evaluation of fixation systems of maxillofacial fractures.
    Ji B; Wang C; Song F; Chen M; Wang H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 40(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 21865052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.