These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18363772)

  • 21. Ratio estimation with measurement error in the auxiliary variate.
    Gregoire TG; Salas C
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):590-8. PubMed ID: 18759838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial sampling.
    Thompson SK
    Ciba Found Symp; 1997; 210():161-9; discussion 169-72. PubMed ID: 9573475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detectability in conventional and adaptive sampling.
    Thompson SK; Seber GA
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):712-24. PubMed ID: 7981397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved non-negative estimation of variance components for exposure assessment.
    Peretz C; Steinberg DM
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 11687915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construction of resolvable spatial row-column designs.
    Williams ER; John JA; Whitaker D
    Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 16542235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating average annual percent change for disease rates without assuming constant change.
    Fay MP; Tiwari RC; Feuer EJ; Zou Z
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):847-54. PubMed ID: 16984328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On improved calibrations of unknowns in a system of quality-controlled assays.
    Hochberg Y; Marom I; Keret R; Peleg S
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 6871366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the small sample performance of several variance estimators under competing risks.
    Braun TM; Yuan Z
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(5):1170-80. PubMed ID: 16900556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimal two-phase sampling design for comparing accuracies of two binary classification rules.
    Xu H; Hui SL; Grannis S
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):500-13. PubMed ID: 24038175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modelling the sampling design in the analysis of health surveys.
    Graubard BI; Korn EL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):263-81. PubMed ID: 8931196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite sample adjustments in estimating equations and covariance estimators for intracluster correlations.
    Preisser JS; Lu B; Qaqish BF
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(27):5764-85. PubMed ID: 18680122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perpendicular distance models for line transect sampling.
    Buckland ST
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):177-95. PubMed ID: 4005374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Bayesian model for estimating population means using a link-tracing sampling design.
    St Clair K; O'Connell D
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):165-73. PubMed ID: 21668905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Asymptotically efficient two-step estimators of the hazards ratio for follow-up studies and survival data.
    Anderson JR; Bernstein L
    Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):733-9. PubMed ID: 4074822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of length biased sampling of unobserved sojourn times on the survival distribution when disease is screen detected.
    Kafadar K; Prorok PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(16):2116-46. PubMed ID: 19424959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The accelerated failure time model under biased sampling.
    Mandel M; Ritov Y
    Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1306-8; discussion 1308. PubMed ID: 19995351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Designs for slope ratio assays.
    Buonaccorsi JP
    Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):875-82. PubMed ID: 3814728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Line transect methods for plant surveys.
    Buckland ST; Borchers DL; Johnston A; Henrys PA; Marques TA
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):989-98. PubMed ID: 18078477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A sequential design to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic or screening test.
    Wruck LM; Yiannoutsos CT; Hughes MD
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3458-73. PubMed ID: 16374904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using hidden Markov models to deal with availability bias on line transect surveys.
    Borchers DL; Zucchini W; Heide-Jørgensen MP; Cañadas A; Langrock R
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):703-13. PubMed ID: 23848543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.