BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18363862)

  • 1. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae).
    Urbanelli S; Porretta D
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1520-7. PubMed ID: 18363862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of premating reproductive isolation among conspecific populations of the sea rock-pool beetle Ochthebius urbanelliae driven by reinforcing natural selection.
    Porretta D; Urbanelli S
    Evolution; 2012 Apr; 66(4):1284-95. PubMed ID: 22486705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic divergence and reproductive isolation in the Ochthebius (Calobius) complex (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae).
    Urbanelli S
    Heredity (Edinb); 2002 May; 88(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 11986868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.
    Jennings JH; Etges WJ
    Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divergent outcomes of reinforcement speciation: the relative importance of assortative mating and migration modification.
    Yukilevich R; True JR
    Am Nat; 2006 May; 167(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 16671009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation.
    Hoskin CJ; Higgie M; McDonald KR; Moritz C
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7063):1353-6. PubMed ID: 16251964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable assortative mating in replicate mating trials using Drosophila melanogaster populations derived from contrasting opposing slopes of 'Evolution Canyon', Israel.
    Drake A; Rashkovetsky E; Wong D; Rundle HD; Mooers AØ
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1123-9. PubMed ID: 16033586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sympatric speciation in a genus of marine reef fishes.
    Crow KD; Munehara H; Bernardi G
    Mol Ecol; 2010 May; 19(10):2089-105. PubMed ID: 20345669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phenotypic divergence but not genetic distance predicts assortative mating among species of a cichlid fish radiation.
    Stelkens RB; Seehausen O
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1679-94. PubMed ID: 19549141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely.
    Arnegard ME; Kondrashov AS
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):222-37. PubMed ID: 15068341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.
    Nosil P; Crespi BJ; Gries R; Gries G
    Genetica; 2007 Mar; 129(3):309-27. PubMed ID: 16900317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid evolution of sexual signals in sympatric Calopteryx damselflies: reinforcement or 'noisy-neighbour' ecological character displacement?
    Mullen SP; Andrés JA
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1637-48. PubMed ID: 17584256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phylogenetic analyses of the leaf beetle genus Galerucella: evidence for host switching at speciation?
    Borghuis A; van Groenendael J; Madsen O; Ouborg J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Nov; 53(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 19596455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LE; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 15119440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement: implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond.
    Ortiz-Barrientos D; Grealy A; Nosil P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():156-82. PubMed ID: 19566707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiation between two salt marsh beetle ecotypes: evidence for ongoing speciation.
    Dhuyvetter H; Hendrickx F; Gaublomme E; Desender K
    Evolution; 2007 Jan; 61(1):184-93. PubMed ID: 17300437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Gilbert LE
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):278-85. PubMed ID: 17210020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.