BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18364501)

  • 1. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials in cancer: a review of current practices.
    Murray DM; Pals SL; Blitstein JL; Alfano CM; Lehman J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):483-91. PubMed ID: 18364501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical trial design issues: at least 10 things you should look for in clinical trials.
    Glasser SP; Howard G
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2006 Oct; 46(10):1106-15. PubMed ID: 16988199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
    Parent N; Hanley JA
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival end point reporting in randomized cancer clinical trials: a review of major journals.
    Mathoulin-Pelissier S; Gourgou-Bourgade S; Bonnetain F; Kramar A
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(22):3721-6. PubMed ID: 18669458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
    Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
    Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The number, content, and quality of randomized controlled trials in the prevention and care of injuries.
    Stelfox HT; Goverman J
    J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1488-93. PubMed ID: 19077647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.
    Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Stedman M; Avorn J; Solomon DH
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. PubMed ID: 17909381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting adverse events in randomized controlled trials.
    Nuovo J; Sather C
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Mar; 16(3):349-51. PubMed ID: 16998947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fecal incontinence: the quality of reported randomized, controlled trials in the last ten years.
    Parés D; Norton C; Chelvanayagam S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jan; 51(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 18085335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: Explanation and elaboration.
    Gagnier JJ; Boon H; Rochon P; Moher D; Barnes J; Bombardier C;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 59(11):1134-49. PubMed ID: 17027423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of cluster-randomized trials on maternal and child health research in developing countries.
    Handlos LN; Chakraborty H; Sen PK
    Trop Med Int Health; 2009 Aug; 14(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 19563429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The design and interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research in critical care.
    Arnold DM; Burns KE; Adhikari NK; Kho ME; Meade MO; Cook DJ;
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 19104228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
    Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods.
    Willan A; Kowgier M
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 18697843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.