BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18365008)

  • 1. Haplotype reconstruction error as a classical misclassification problem: introducing sensitivity and specificity as error measures.
    Lamina C; Bongardt F; Küchenhoff H; Heid IM
    PLoS One; 2008 Mar; 3(3):e1853. PubMed ID: 18365008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haplotype misclassification resulting from statistical reconstruction and genotype error, and its impact on association estimates.
    Lamina C; Küchenhoff H; Chang-Claude J; Paulweber B; Wichmann HE; Illig T; Hoehe MR; Kronenberg F; Heid IM
    Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Sep; 74(5):452-62. PubMed ID: 20649529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
    Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [How about the uncertainty in the haplotypes in the population-based KORA studies?].
    Heid IM; Lamina C; Bongardt F; Fischer G; Klopp N; Huth C; Küchenhoff H; Kronenberg F; Wichmann HE; Illig T
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Aug; 67 Suppl 1():S132-6. PubMed ID: 16032531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques.
    Kraft P; Cox DG; Paynter RA; Hunter D; De Vivo I
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15637718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of haplotype frequency estimation for biallelic loci, via the expectation-maximization algorithm for unphased diploid genotype data.
    Fallin D; Schork NJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 10954684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large-scale single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and haplotype analyses, using dense SNP Maps, of 199 drug-related genes in 752 subjects: the analysis of the association between uncommon SNPs within haplotype blocks and the haplotypes constructed with haplotype-tagging SNPs.
    Kamatani N; Sekine A; Kitamoto T; Iida A; Saito S; Kogame A; Inoue E; Kawamoto M; Harigai M; Nakamura Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Aug; 75(2):190-203. PubMed ID: 15202072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selecting Closely-Linked SNPs Based on Local Epistatic Effects for Haplotype Construction Improves Power of Association Mapping.
    Liu F; Schmidt RH; Reif JC; Jiang Y
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Dec; 9(12):4115-4126. PubMed ID: 31604824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum error correction-based haplotype assembly: Considerations for long read data.
    Majidian S; Kahaei MH; de Ridder D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234470. PubMed ID: 32530974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fixed-length haplotypes can improve genomic prediction accuracy in an admixed dairy cattle population.
    Hess M; Druet T; Hess A; Garrick D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):54. PubMed ID: 28673233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haplotype uncertainty in association studies.
    Mensah FK; Gilthorpe MS; Davies CF; Keen LJ; Adamson PJ; Roman E; Morgan GJ; Bidwell JL; Law GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):348-57. PubMed ID: 17323369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic search for SNPs/haplotypes associated with disease phenotypes using a haplotype-based stepwise procedure.
    Yang Y; Li SS; Chien JW; Andriesen J; Zhao LP
    BMC Genet; 2008 Dec; 9():90. PubMed ID: 19102730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative haplotype construction methods for genomic evaluation.
    Jónás D; Ducrocq V; Fouilloux MN; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jun; 99(6):4537-4546. PubMed ID: 26995132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are molecular haplotypes worth the time and expense? A cost-effective method for applying molecular haplotypes.
    Levenstien MA; Ott J; Gordon D
    PLoS Genet; 2006 Aug; 2(8):e127. PubMed ID: 16933998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of haplotype frequency estimation when nuclear family information is included.
    Becker T; Knapp M
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 12446986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating haplotype frequencies and standard errors for multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Li SS; Khalid N; Carlson C; Zhao LP
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 14557108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection using genotype data and their applications to association studies.
    Zhang K; Qin ZS; Liu JS; Chen T; Waterman MS; Sun F
    Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):908-16. PubMed ID: 15078859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint haplotype assembly and genotype calling via sequential Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ahn S; Vikalo H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 16():223. PubMed ID: 26178880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct analysis of unphased SNP genotype data in population-based association studies via Bayesian partition modelling of haplotypes.
    Morris AP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 15940704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.