617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18365827)
21. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.
Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional gradient echo versus spin echo sequence in contrast-enhanced imaging of the pituitary gland at 3T.
Kakite S; Fujii S; Kurosaki M; Kanasaki Y; Matsusue E; Kaminou T; Ogawa T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20116954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High-resolution STIR for 3-T MRI of the posterior fossa: visualization of the lower cranial nerves and arteriovenous structures related to neurovascular compression.
Hiwatashi A; Yoshiura T; Yamashita K; Kamano H; Honda H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):644-8. PubMed ID: 22915406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast-enhanced multi-shot echo-planar FLAIR in the depiction of metastatic tumors of the brain: comparison with contrast-enhanced spin-echo T1-weighted imaging.
Tomura N; Narita K; Takahashi S; Otani T; Sakuma I; Yasuda K; Nishii T; Watarai J
Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 17957522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dose comparison of single- vs. double-dose in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: Intraindividual cross-over blinded trial using Gd-DTPA.
Jourdan C; Heverhagen JT; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 17326082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contrast-enhanced, high-resolution, susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: dose-dependent optimization at 3 tesla and 1.5 tesla in healthy volunteers.
Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Pinker K; Barth M; Mlynarik V; Ba-Ssalamah A; Saringer WF; Weber M; Benesch T; Witoszynskyj S; Rauscher A; Reichenbach JR; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Mar; 41(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16481907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High-resolution MRI of cranial nerves in posterior fossa at 3.0 T.
Guo ZY; Chen J; Liang QZ; Liao HY; Cheng QY; Fu SX; Chen CX; Yu D
Asian Pac J Trop Med; 2013 Feb; 6(2):159-61. PubMed ID: 23339922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamic MR imaging in Tolosa-Hunt syndrome.
Haque TL; Miki Y; Kashii S; Yamamoto A; Kanagaki M; Takahashi T; Fushimi Y; Asato R; Murase N; Shibasaki H; Konishi J
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 15294327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of optimized inversion-recovery fat-suppression techniques for T2-weighted abdominal MR imaging.
Lauenstein TC; Sharma P; Hughes T; Heberlein K; Tudorascu D; Martin DR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1448-54. PubMed ID: 18504735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improvement in B1-inhomogeneity artifacts in the abdomen at 3T MR imaging using a radiofrequency cushion.
Franklin KM; Dale BM; Merkle EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):1443-7. PubMed ID: 18421685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Water excitation MPRAGE: an alternative sequence for postcontrast imaging of the abdomen in noncooperative patients at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla MRI.
Altun E; Semelka RC; Dale BM; Elias J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1146-54. PubMed ID: 18425826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model.
Röttgen R; Herzog H; Bogen P; Freund T; Felix R; Bruhn H
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 16814140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High-resolution MRI of the human parotid gland and duct at 7 Tesla.
Kraff O; Theysohn JM; Maderwald S; Kokulinsky PC; Dogan Z; Kerem A; Kruszona S; Ladd ME; Gizewski ER; Ladd SC
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):518-24. PubMed ID: 19652615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.
Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Incidental magnetization transfer effects in multislice brain MRI at 3.0T.
Chang Y; Bae SJ; Lee YJ; Hwang MJ; Lee SH; Lee J; Lee SK; Woo S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 25(4):862-5. PubMed ID: 17335009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 tesla versus 3.0 tesla.
Huang BY; Castillo M
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 Feb; 17(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 19364598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla MRI in patients with chronic liver diseases.
Ramalho M; Herédia V; Tsurusaki M; Altun E; Semelka RC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 29(4):869-79. PubMed ID: 19306415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
