172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1836654)
1. [Comparison of rectal examination, transrectal echography, CAT and MRI in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
Montorsi F; Guazzoni G; Consonni P; Colombo R; Nava L; Bergamaschi F; Scattoni V; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl; 1991 Jun; 63 Suppl 2():143-5. PubMed ID: 1836654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients with abnormal ultrasound of the prostate but normal digital rectal examination should be classified as having clinical stage T2 tumors.
Tiguert R; Gheiler EL; Grignon DJ; Littrup PJ; Sakr W; Pontes JE; Wood DP
J Urol; 2000 May; 163(5):1486-90. PubMed ID: 10751863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transrectal ultrasound versus digital rectal examination for the staging of carcinoma of the prostate: results of a prospective, multi-institutional trial.
Smith JA; Scardino PT; Resnick MI; Hernandez AD; Rose SC; Egger MJ
J Urol; 1997 Mar; 157(3):902-6. PubMed ID: 9072596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Preoperative staging of prostatic carcinoma: evaluation of the role of transrectal echography].
Lorusso A; Curatolo C; Cirillo Marucco E; Ludovico GM; Limitone DA; Pagliarulo A
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 1996 Dec; 68(5 Suppl):83-5. PubMed ID: 9162382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Effectiveness of transrectal ultrasonography in local staging of prostatic cancer].
Herranz Amo F; Díez Cordero JM; Verdú Tartajo F; Lledo García E; Jara Rascón J; González Chamorro F; Rodríguez Fernández E
Actas Urol Esp; 1997 Jun; 21(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 9412192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Usefulness and limitation of digital rectal examination and imaging studies in staging prostate cancer].
Egawa S; Kawakami T; Nishimaki H; Kuwao S; Uchida T; Yokoyama E; Mashimo S; Koshiba K
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 85(5):792-801. PubMed ID: 8022142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Transrectal echography of the prostate and its value in screening for prostatic carcinoma].
Kil PJ; Hendrikx AJ; Debruyne FM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Feb; 134(8):385-90. PubMed ID: 2179743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of local tumour extension in cases of carcinoma of the prostate.
Wolff JM; Borchers H; Jakse G
Arch Esp Urol; 1997 Jun; 50(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 9253209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Importance of transrectal ultrasonography in the detection of local recurrence of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy].
L'upták J; Kliment J; Svihra J; Eliás B
Rozhl Chir; 2001 Feb; 80(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 12881924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value and limitations of transrectal ultrasonography and computer tomography in preoperative staging of prostate carcinoma].
Barbieri A; Monica B; Sebastio N; Incarbone GP; Di Stefano C
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 1997; 68(1-2):23-6. PubMed ID: 9478254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Can CT scanner and MRI predict capsular invasion of local cancer of the prostate? A study of 20 radical prostatectomies].
Quintens H; Chevallier D; Michels JF; Padovani B; Villers A; Amiel J; Toubol J
Ann Urol (Paris); 1990; 24(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 2221840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of prostate cancer.
Akin O; Hricak H
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Jan; 45(1):207-22. PubMed ID: 17157630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T3 prostate cancer: how reliable is clinical staging?
Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod L
Semin Urol Oncol; 1997 Nov; 15(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9421446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical application of MRI for urological malignancy. 1: Usefulness of various imaging modalities for local staging of prostatic cancer; a comparison between MRI, CT and transrectal ultrasonography].
Nishimura K; Kita Y; Arai Y; Oishi K; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Kakano Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Dec; 34(12):2083-9. PubMed ID: 3071121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Transrectal echography: diagnostic accuracy in the local staging of cancer of the prostate].
Fernández Fernández A; Mayayo Dehesa T; Rodríguez Luna JM
Arch Esp Urol; 1991; 44(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 2064421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is preoperative transrectal ultrasonography of value in localised prostatic carcinoma? A blind comparative study between preoperative transrectal ultrasonography and the histopathological radical prostatectomy specimen.
Vijverberg PL; Giessen MC; Kurth KH; Dabhoiwala NF; de Reijke TM; van den Tweel JG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 1426295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of prostate carcinoma staging: comparison of imaging and clinical methods.
Huch Böni RA; Boner JA; Debatin JF; Trinkler F; Knönagel H; Von Hochstetter A; Helfenstein U; Krestin GP
Clin Radiol; 1995 Sep; 50(9):593-600. PubMed ID: 7554732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transrectal ultrasonography compared to histopathological assessment for local staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Enlund A; Pedersen K; Boeryd B; Varenhorst E
Acta Radiol; 1990 Nov; 31(6):597-600. PubMed ID: 2278785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
