BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1836712)

  • 1. Natural family planning and sex selection: fact or fiction?
    Gray RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):1982-4. PubMed ID: 1836712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fertility awareness and natural family planning.
    Pyper CM
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1997 Jun; 2(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 9678103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex ratio associated with timing of insemination and length of the follicular phase in planned and unplanned pregnancies during use of natural family planning.
    Gray RH; Simpson JL; Bitto AC; Queenan JT; Li C; Kambic RT; Perez A; Mena P; Barbato M; Stevenson W; Jennings V
    Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13(5):1397-400. PubMed ID: 9647580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural family planning: a review.
    Klaus H
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Feb; 37(2):128-50. PubMed ID: 7033851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Natural family planning": effective birth control supported by the Catholic Church.
    Ryder RE
    BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):723-6. PubMed ID: 8401097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical relevance of sex selection techniques.
    Zarutskie PW; Muller CH; Magone M; Soules MR
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Dec; 52(6):891-905. PubMed ID: 2687028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of conception and the risk of spontaneous abortion among pregnancies occurring during the use of natural family planning.
    Gray RH; Simpson JL; Kambic RT; Queenan JT; Mena P; Perez A; Barbato M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 172(5):1567-72. PubMed ID: 7755073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific bases for NFP beyond question.
    Kippley JF
    CCL Family Found; 1996; 22(5):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12290958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial: On rhythm and sex ratio.
    Revelle R
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Nov; 291(20):1083. PubMed ID: 4412967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the fertile phase of the human menstrual cycle.
    Royston P
    Stat Med; 1991 Feb; 10(2):221-40. PubMed ID: 2052801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemiological studies of natural family planning.
    Gray RH; Kambic RT
    Hum Reprod; 1988 Jul; 3(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 3170708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hormonal and behavioral determinants of the secondary sex ratio.
    Martin JF
    Soc Biol; 1995; 42(3-4):226-38. PubMed ID: 8738548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver variation in estimation of day of conception intercourse using selected natural family planning charts.
    Kambic R; Gray RH
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Mar; 51(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 2920843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of natural conceptual cycles occurring in a prospective study of sex preselection: fertility awareness symptoms, hormone levels, sperm survival, and pregnancy outcome.
    France JT; Graham FM; Gosling L; Hair P; Knox BS
    Int J Fertil; 1992; 37(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 1354212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of the preselection of the sex of offspring by timing intercourse relative to ovulation.
    France JT; Graham FM; Gosling L; Hair PI
    Fertil Steril; 1984 Jun; 41(6):894-900. PubMed ID: 6586497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. More about natural family planning.
    Gallagher J
    Aust Fam Physician; 1983 Nov; 12(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 6667188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal relation of ovulation to salivary and vaginal electrical resistance patterns: implications for natural family planning.
    Moreno JE; Weitzman GA; Doody MC; Gibbons WE; Besch P; Goldzieher JW
    Contraception; 1988 Oct; 38(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 3208515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse.
    Bigelow JL; Dunson DB; Stanford JB; Ecochard R; Gnoth C; Colombo B
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 14990542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful sex pre-selection using natural family planning.
    McSweeney L
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 21987941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Lady Free Biotester in determining the fertile period.
    Fehring RJ; Gaska N
    Contraception; 1998 May; 57(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 9673839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.