These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1836712)

  • 1. Natural family planning and sex selection: fact or fiction?
    Gray RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 165(6 Pt 2):1982-4. PubMed ID: 1836712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fertility awareness and natural family planning.
    Pyper CM
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1997 Jun; 2(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 9678103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex ratio associated with timing of insemination and length of the follicular phase in planned and unplanned pregnancies during use of natural family planning.
    Gray RH; Simpson JL; Bitto AC; Queenan JT; Li C; Kambic RT; Perez A; Mena P; Barbato M; Stevenson W; Jennings V
    Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13(5):1397-400. PubMed ID: 9647580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural family planning: a review.
    Klaus H
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1982 Feb; 37(2):128-50. PubMed ID: 7033851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Natural family planning": effective birth control supported by the Catholic Church.
    Ryder RE
    BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):723-6. PubMed ID: 8401097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical relevance of sex selection techniques.
    Zarutskie PW; Muller CH; Magone M; Soules MR
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Dec; 52(6):891-905. PubMed ID: 2687028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of conception and the risk of spontaneous abortion among pregnancies occurring during the use of natural family planning.
    Gray RH; Simpson JL; Kambic RT; Queenan JT; Mena P; Perez A; Barbato M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 172(5):1567-72. PubMed ID: 7755073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific bases for NFP beyond question.
    Kippley JF
    CCL Family Found; 1996; 22(5):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12290958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial: On rhythm and sex ratio.
    Revelle R
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Nov; 291(20):1083. PubMed ID: 4412967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the fertile phase of the human menstrual cycle.
    Royston P
    Stat Med; 1991 Feb; 10(2):221-40. PubMed ID: 2052801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemiological studies of natural family planning.
    Gray RH; Kambic RT
    Hum Reprod; 1988 Jul; 3(5):693-8. PubMed ID: 3170708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hormonal and behavioral determinants of the secondary sex ratio.
    Martin JF
    Soc Biol; 1995; 42(3-4):226-38. PubMed ID: 8738548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver variation in estimation of day of conception intercourse using selected natural family planning charts.
    Kambic R; Gray RH
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Mar; 51(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 2920843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of natural conceptual cycles occurring in a prospective study of sex preselection: fertility awareness symptoms, hormone levels, sperm survival, and pregnancy outcome.
    France JT; Graham FM; Gosling L; Hair P; Knox BS
    Int J Fertil; 1992; 37(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 1354212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of the preselection of the sex of offspring by timing intercourse relative to ovulation.
    France JT; Graham FM; Gosling L; Hair PI
    Fertil Steril; 1984 Jun; 41(6):894-900. PubMed ID: 6586497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. More about natural family planning.
    Gallagher J
    Aust Fam Physician; 1983 Nov; 12(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 6667188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal relation of ovulation to salivary and vaginal electrical resistance patterns: implications for natural family planning.
    Moreno JE; Weitzman GA; Doody MC; Gibbons WE; Besch P; Goldzieher JW
    Contraception; 1988 Oct; 38(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 3208515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse.
    Bigelow JL; Dunson DB; Stanford JB; Ecochard R; Gnoth C; Colombo B
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 14990542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful sex pre-selection using natural family planning.
    McSweeney L
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 21987941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Lady Free Biotester in determining the fertile period.
    Fehring RJ; Gaska N
    Contraception; 1998 May; 57(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 9673839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.