These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18367690)

  • 1. The effects of hearing aid compression parameters on the short-term dynamic range of continuous speech.
    Henning RL; Bentler RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):471-84. PubMed ID: 18367690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K; Killion MC; Christensen LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compression-dependent differences in hearing aid gain between speech and nonspeech input signals.
    Henning RW; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 16079635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility.
    Jenstad LM; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):651-67. PubMed ID: 16197279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of single-channel linear amplification and two-channel wide-dynamic-range-compression amplification by means of an independent-group design.
    Humes LE; Humes LE; Wilson DL
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 15248803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of dynamic compression on directional hearing in the horizontal plane.
    Musa-Shufani S; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 16672796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent developments in air-conduction hearing aids.
    Arlinger S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 May; 76(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 9170712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Speech discrimination and dynamic compression. A comparative study with hearing aids (author's transl)].
    Welleschik B; Wicke W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Jul; 56(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 142877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The objective and subjective evaluation of multichannel expansion in wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments.
    Plyler PN; Lowery KJ; Hamby HM; Trine TD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 17344545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactive fitting of multiple algorithms implemented in the same digital hearing aid.
    Franck BA; Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jul; 46(7):388-97. PubMed ID: 17680471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term usage of modern signal processing by listeners with severe or profound hearing loss: a retrospective survey.
    Keidser G; Hartley D; Carter L
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 18840704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The subjective evaluation of the expansion time constant in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments.
    Plyler PN; Trine TD; Blair Hill A
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 16777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.
    Bentler R; Wu YH; Kettel J; Hurtig R
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):447-60. PubMed ID: 18698521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Sundewall-Thorén E; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S91-8. PubMed ID: 19012116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing aids: a review of what's new.
    Kim HH; Barrs DM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Jun; 134(6):1043-50. PubMed ID: 16730553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SII and fit-to-target analysis of compression system performance as a function of number of compression channels.
    Woods WS; Van Tasell DJ; Rickert ME; Trine TD
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):630-44. PubMed ID: 17118906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions of hearing aid compression release time and fitting formula: effects on speech acoustics.
    Ellison JC; Harris FP; Muller T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003; 14(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 12830842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.