BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18367790)

  • 1. Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factors kQ for electron dosimetry with a parallel-plate Roos chamber.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1595-607. PubMed ID: 18367790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positioning of a plane-parallel ionization chamber in clinical electron beams and the impact on perturbation factors.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):2421-35. PubMed ID: 19336840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perturbation correction factors for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber in water in high-energy electron beams.
    Verhaegen F; Zakikhani R; Dusautoy A; Palmans H; Bostock G; Shipley D; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1221-35. PubMed ID: 16481689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beam quality corrections for parallel-plate ion chambers in electron reference dosimetry.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1831-54. PubMed ID: 22411097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the p(dis) correction factor for cylindrical chambers.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):L9-16; author reply L17-9. PubMed ID: 20157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers in clinical electron dosimetry.
    Araki F
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4033-40. PubMed ID: 18841855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the wall perturbation correction for a parallel-plate NACP-02 chamber in clinical electron beams.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1045-54. PubMed ID: 21452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations.
    Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The determination of beam quality correction factors: Monte Carlo simulations and measurements.
    González-Castaño DM; Hartmann GH; Sánchez-Doblado F; Gómez F; Kapsch RP; Pena J; Capote R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4723-41. PubMed ID: 19622853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121722. PubMed ID: 24320508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte-Carlo-based perturbation and beam quality correction factors for thimble ionization chambers in high-energy photon beams.
    Wulff J; Heverhagen JT; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2823-36. PubMed ID: 18460747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wall correction factors, Pwall, for parallel-plate ionization chambers.
    Buckley LA; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1788-96. PubMed ID: 16872086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of dose perturbation factors of a NACP-02 ionization chamber in clinical electron beams.
    Chin E; Palmans H; Shipley D; Bailey M; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):307-26. PubMed ID: 19098357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo study of correction factors for the use of plastic phantoms in clinical electron dosimetry.
    Araki F
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4368-77. PubMed ID: 18072502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wall correction factors, Pwall, for thimble ionization chambers.
    Buckley LA; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 16532953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.