119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18367795)
1. Role of the parameters involved in the plan optimization based on the generalized equivalent uniform dose and radiobiological implications.
Widesott L; Strigari L; Pressello MC; Benassi M; Landoni V
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1665-75. PubMed ID: 18367795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superiority of equivalent uniform dose (EUD)-based optimization for breast and chest wall.
Mihailidis DN; Plants B; Farinash L; Harmon M; Whaley L; Raja P; Tomara P
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 19931018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the parameter describing the generalised equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) for tumours.
Søvik A; Ovrum J; Olsen DR; Malinen E
Phys Med; 2007 Dec; 23(3-4):100-6. PubMed ID: 17962057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlling the dose distribution with gEUD-type constraints within the convex radiotherapy optimization framework.
Zinchenko Y; Craig T; Keller H; Terlaky T; Sharpe M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3231-50. PubMed ID: 18506069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The normal tissue sparing obtained with simultaneous treatment of pelvic lymph nodes and bladder using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Søndergaard J; Høyer M; Petersen JB; Wright P; Grau C; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 18759144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the gEUD biological optimization objective for organs at risk in Photon Optimizer of Eclipse treatment planning system.
Fogliata A; Thompson S; Stravato A; Tomatis S; Scorsetti M; Cozzi L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):106-114. PubMed ID: 29152846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of larynx-sparing techniques with IMRT when treating the head and neck.
Webster GJ; Rowbottom CG; Ho KF; Slevin NJ; Mackay RI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):617-22. PubMed ID: 18793966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose-volume objectives.
Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Wu Y; Zhou J; Liu HH; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 12608607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Convex reformulation of biologically-based multi-criteria intensity-modulated radiation therapy optimization including fractionation effects.
Hoffmann AL; den Hertog D; Siem AY; Kaanders JH; Huizenga H
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6345-62. PubMed ID: 18941280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships between rectal wall dose-volume constraints and radiobiologic indices of toxicity for patients with prostate cancer.
Marzi S; Arcangeli G; Saracino B; Petrongari MG; Bruzzaniti V; Iaccarino G; Landoni V; Soriani A; Benassi M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 May; 68(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17276615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study.
Giantsoudi D; Baltas D; Karabis A; Mavroidis P; Zamboglou N; Tselis N; Shi C; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041704. PubMed ID: 23556874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the role of modeling parameters in IMRT plan optimization.
Krause M; Scherrer A; Thieke C
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4907-26. PubMed ID: 18711248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and quantification of patient set-up errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients and their biological and dosimetric impact in terms of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
Boughalia A; Marcie S; Fellah M; Chami S; Mekki F
Br J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 88(1050):20140839. PubMed ID: 25882689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantage of biological over physical optimization in prostate cancer?
Dirscherl T; Alvarez-Moret J; Bogner L
Z Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 21(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 21530201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose-volume objectives in multi-criteria optimization.
Halabi T; Craft D; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3809-18. PubMed ID: 16861782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Large cohort dose-volume response analysis of parotid gland function after radiotherapy: intensity-modulated versus conventional radiotherapy.
Dijkema T; Terhaard CH; Roesink JM; Braam PM; van Gils CH; Moerland MA; Raaijmakers CP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(4):1101-9. PubMed ID: 18472355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
