431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18367824)
1. Development of a System for Measuring Wall Shear Stress in Blood Vessels using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Yoshida K; Nagao T; Okada K; Miyazaki S; Yang X; Yamazaki Y; Murase K
Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 27(3):136-49. PubMed ID: 18367824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of inlet velocity profiles on patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulations of the carotid bifurcation.
Campbell IC; Ries J; Dhawan SS; Quyyumi AA; Taylor WR; Oshinski JN
J Biomech Eng; 2012 May; 134(5):051001. PubMed ID: 22757489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions.
Papathanasopoulou P; Zhao S; Köhler U; Robertson MB; Long Q; Hoskins P; Xu XY; Marshall I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12541221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Errors in the estimation of wall shear stress by maximum Doppler velocity.
Mynard JP; Wasserman BA; Steinman DA
Atherosclerosis; 2013 Apr; 227(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 23398945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of inlet and outlet boundary conditions in image-based CFD modeling of aortic flow.
Madhavan S; Kemmerling EMC
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 May; 17(1):66. PubMed ID: 29843730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of anesthesia and fluid-structure interaction on simulated shear stress patterns in the carotid bifurcation of mice.
De Wilde D; Trachet B; De Meyer G; Segers P
J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2741-2747. PubMed ID: 27342001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alterations in regional vascular geometry produced by theoretical stent implantation influence distributions of wall shear stress: analysis of a curved coronary artery using 3D computational fluid dynamics modeling.
LaDisa JF; Olson LE; Douglas HA; Warltier DC; Kersten JR; Pagel PS
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Jun; 5():40. PubMed ID: 16780592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
Frolov SV; Sindeev SV; Liepsch D; Balasso A
Technol Health Care; 2016 May; 24(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 26835725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models.
Marshall I; Zhao S; Papathanasopoulou P; Hoskins P; Xu Y
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15046997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometrically induced wall shear stress variability in CFD-MRI coupled simulations of blood flow in the thoracic aortas.
Perinajová R; Juffermans JF; Westenberg JJM; van der Palen RLF; van den Boogaard PJ; Lamb HJ; Kenjereš S
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jun; 133():104385. PubMed ID: 33894502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; van Ooij P; Veeturi SS; Tutino VM; Zwanenburg JJ; Meng H
Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103759. PubMed ID: 32421656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimizing the blood velocity differences between phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics simulation in cerebral arteries and aneurysms.
Mohd Adib MAH; Ii S; Watanabe Y; Wada S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Sep; 55(9):1605-1619. PubMed ID: 28161877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inlet conditions for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation: is it reasonable to assume fully developed flow?
Moyle KR; Antiga L; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 16706586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions.
Köhler U; Marshall I; Robertson MB; Long Q; Xu XY; Hoskins PR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Nov; 14(5):563-73. PubMed ID: 11747008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow-based method demonstrates improved accuracy for calculating wall shear stress in arterial flows from 4D flow MRI data.
Hurd ER; Iffrig E; Jiang D; Oshinski JN; Timmins LH
J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 146():111413. PubMed ID: 36535100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of blood rheology in patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulation of stenotic carotid arteries.
Mendieta JB; Fontanarosa D; Wang J; Paritala PK; McGahan T; Lloyd T; Li Z
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Oct; 19(5):1477-1490. PubMed ID: 31894438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Errors in power-law estimations of inflow rates for intracranial aneurysm CFD.
Chnafa C; Bouillot P; Brina O; Najafi M; Delattre BMA; Vargas MI; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 80():159-165. PubMed ID: 30243498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]