These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18368584)

  • 21. The influence of the auditory prosthesis type on deaf children's voice quality.
    Valero Garcia J; Rovira JM; Sanvicens LG
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 74(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 20472309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A frog in your throat or in your ear? Searching for the causes of poor singing.
    Hutchins SM; Peretz I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):76-97. PubMed ID: 21875245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pitch discrimination and pitch matching abilities of adults who sing inaccurately.
    Bradshaw E; McHenry MA
    J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 16102669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treatment responsiveness of the Singing Voice Handicap Index.
    Cohen SM; Witsell DL; Scearce L; Vess G; Banka C
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1705-8. PubMed ID: 18677273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Voice analysis in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Campisi P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):760. PubMed ID: 16442167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Vocal effectiveness in speech and singing: acoustical, physiological and perceptive aspects. applications in speech therapy].
    Pillot C; Vaissière J
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2006; 127(5):293-8. PubMed ID: 17425003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Formant frequencies in Middle Eastern singers.
    Hamdan AL; Tabri D; Deeb R; Rifai H; Rameh C; Fuleihan N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2008; 29(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 18439952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changes in listening habits and quality of musical sound after cochlear implantation.
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Herrán B; Sanz L; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Mar; 138(3):363-7. PubMed ID: 18312886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Musical ear syndrome in adult cochlear implant patients.
    Low WK; Tham CA; D'Souza VD; Teng SW
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Sep; 127(9):854-8. PubMed ID: 23941807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vocal amusia in a professional tango singer due to a right superior temporal cortex infarction.
    Terao Y; Mizuno T; Shindoh M; Sakurai Y; Ugawa Y; Kobayashi S; Nagai C; Furubayashi T; Arai N; Okabe S; Mochizuki H; Hanajima R; Tsuji S
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):479-88. PubMed ID: 15982678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The speaking fundamental frequency and the singing voice type].
    Chernobel'skiĭ SI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2010; (6):36-7. PubMed ID: 21311458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of pitch matching significantly improved by live voice model.
    Granot RY; Israel-Kolatt R; Gilboa A; Kolatt T
    J Voice; 2013 May; 27(3):390.e13-20. PubMed ID: 23528675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between vocal pitch-matching skills and pitch discrimination skills in untrained accurate and inaccurate singers.
    Watts C; Moore R; McCaghren K
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 16301100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A study on the normal values of musical sounds in cochlear implants test battery].
    Dong R; Wang S; Zhou Y; Qi B; Chen X; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 27(13):712-6. PubMed ID: 24073580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Changes in the speaking fundamental frequency after cochlear implantation].
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B; Chabolle F
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1988; 105(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 3408096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impaired pitch production and preserved rhythm production in a right brain-damaged patient with amusia.
    Murayama J; Kashiwagi T; Kashiwagi A; Mimura M
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15380874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustics of the trained versus untrained singing voice.
    Howard DM
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jun; 17(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 19365264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.