These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18370565)
1. The use of QALY weights for QALY calculations: a review of industry submissions requesting listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2002-4. Scuffham PA; Whitty JA; Mitchell A; Viney R Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 18370565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are cancer drugs less likely to be recommended for listing by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee in Australia? Chim L; Kelly PJ; Salkeld G; Stockler MR Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):463-75. PubMed ID: 20465315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of PBAC submissions and outcomes for medicines (2010-2018). Lybrand S; Wonder M Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Jun; 36(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 32524923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the ICERs in Medicine Reimbursement Submissions to NICE and PBAC-Does the Presence of an Explicit Threshold Affect the ICER Proposed? Wang S; Gum D; Merlin T Value Health; 2018 Aug; 21(8):938-943. PubMed ID: 30098671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in australia (1991 to 1996). George B; Harris A; Mitchell A Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19(11):1103-9. PubMed ID: 11735677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated? Ungar WJ Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):641-52. PubMed ID: 21604821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the Quality of the Clinical Evidence in Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Fit for Purpose? Wonder M; Dunlop S Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 26091601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of value for money in public insurance coverage decisions for drugs in Australia: a retrospective analysis 1994-2004. Harris AH; Hill SR; Chin G; Li JJ; Walkom E Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):713-22. PubMed ID: 18378939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS IN AUSTRALIA. Turkstra E; Bettington E; Donohue ML; Mervin MC Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(4):521-528. PubMed ID: 28703092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions: the development of Australian guidelines for pharmaceuticals. Henry D Pharmacoeconomics; 1992 Jan; 1(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 10147039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. Kennedy-Martin M; Slaap B; Herdman M; van Reenen M; Kennedy-Martin T; Greiner W; Busschbach J; Boye KS Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 21(8):1245-1257. PubMed ID: 32514643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it all about price? Why requests for government subsidy of anticancer drugs were rejected in Australia. Karikios DJ; Chim L; Martin A; Nagrial A; Howard K; Salkeld G; Stockler MR Intern Med J; 2017 Apr; 47(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 27928875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Main C; Bojke L; Griffin S; Norman G; Barbieri M; Mather L; Stark D; Palmer S; Riemsma R Health Technol Assess; 2006 Mar; 10(9):1-132. iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16545208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health state valuation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Kularatna S; Whitty JA; Johnson NW; Scuffham PA Value Health; 2013; 16(6):1091-9. PubMed ID: 24041360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia. Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Key considerations in reimbursement decision-making for multiple sclerosis drugs in Australia. Phan YHL; De Abreu Lourenco R; Haas M; van der Linden N Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2018 Oct; 25():144-149. PubMed ID: 30077086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Governments Need Better Guidance to Maximise Value for Money: The Case of Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Carter D; Vogan A; Haji Ali Afzali H Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 26818196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]