397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18371101)
1. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments.
Barone A; Santini S; Marconcini S; Giacomelli L; Gherlone E; Covani U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 18371101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedure.
Vercellotti T; De Paoli S; Nevins M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Dec; 21(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 11794567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Schneiderian membrane perforation rate during sinus elevation using piezosurgery: clinical results of 100 consecutive cases.
Wallace SS; Mazor Z; Froum SJ; Cho SC; Tarnow DP
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Oct; 27(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 17990437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study.
Nkenke E; Schlegel A; Schultze-Mosgau S; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 12182299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two piezoelectric cutting inserts for lateral bony window osteotomy: a retrospective study of 127 consecutive sites.
Sohn DS; Moon JW; Lee HW; Choi BJ; Shin IH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 20556257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New bone formation in the maxillary sinus without bone grafts.
Sohn DS; Lee JS; Ahn MR; Shin HI
Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 18784532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure.
Berengo M; Sivolella S; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 33(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 15050076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Palatal versus vestibular piezoelectric window osteotomy for maxillary sinus elevation: a comparative clinical study of two surgical techniques.
Stübinger S; Saldamli B; Seitz O; Sader R; Landes CA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 19201630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between conventional and piezoelectric surgical tools for maxillary sinus floor elevation. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Rickert D; Vissink A; Slater JJ; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 21745325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous dental implant placement and endoscope-guided internal sinus floor elevation: 2-year post-loading outcomes.
Schleier P; Bierfreund G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Moldenhauer F; Küpper H; Freilich M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1163-70. PubMed ID: 18983320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staged sinus augmentation using a crestal core elevation procedure and modified osteotomes to minimize membrane perforation.
Toffler M
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(9):767-74; quiz 776. PubMed ID: 12593304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective observation of 41 perforations of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation.
Becker ST; Terheyden H; Steinriede A; Behrens E; Springer I; Wiltfang J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1285-9. PubMed ID: 19040444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of new bone formation in the maxillary sinus with and without bone grafts: immunochemical rabbit study.
Sohn DS; Moon JW; Lee WH; Kim SS; Kim CW; Kim KT; Moon YS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1033-42. PubMed ID: 22010087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Piezoelectric-assisted osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: an innovative approach.
Fu PY
Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 20683286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) technique: a new method for internal sinus elevation.
Sohn DS; Lee JS; An KM; Choi BJ
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 20009598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of piezosurgery during maxillary sinus elevation: clinical results of 40 consecutive cases.
Cassetta M; Ricci L; Iezzi G; Calasso S; Piattelli A; Perrotti V
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Dec; 32(6):e182-8. PubMed ID: 23057061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation in the presence of antral septa: a report of 26 procedures.
Kfir E; Goldstein M; Rafaelov R; Yerushalmi I; Kfir V; Mazor Z; Kaluski E
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(5):257-67. PubMed ID: 19882823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internal sinus manipulation (ISM) procedure: a technical report.
Yamada JM; Park HJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 17716256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
