212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18371222)
1. Snagger: a user-friendly program for incorporating additional information for tagSNP selection.
Edlund CK; Lee WH; Li D; Van Den Berg DJ; Conti DV
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():174. PubMed ID: 18371222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient algorithms for genome-wide tagSNP selection across populations via the linkage disequilibrium criterion.
Liu L; Wu Y; Lonardi S; Jiang T
Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():67-78. PubMed ID: 17951813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An efficient comprehensive search algorithm for tagSNP selection using linkage disequilibrium criteria.
Qin ZS; Gopalakrishnan S; Abecasis GR
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 16269414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
Hao K
Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choosing SNPs using feature selection.
Phuong TM; Lin Z; Altman RB
Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2005; ():301-9. PubMed ID: 16447987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FastTagger: an efficient algorithm for genome-wide tag SNP selection using multi-marker linkage disequilibrium.
Liu G; Wang Y; Wong L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():66. PubMed ID: 20113476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MLR-tagging: informative SNP selection for unphased genotypes based on multiple linear regression.
He J; Zelikovsky A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2558-61. PubMed ID: 16895924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. LdCompare: rapid computation of single- and multiple-marker r2 and genetic coverage.
Hao K; Di X; Cawley S
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):252-4. PubMed ID: 17148510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TAGster: efficient selection of LD tag SNPs in single or multiple populations.
Xu Z; Kaplan NL; Taylor JA
Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3254-5. PubMed ID: 17827206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SNP-PHAGE--High throughput SNP discovery pipeline.
Matukumalli LK; Grefenstette JJ; Hyten DL; Choi IY; Cregan PB; Van Tassell CP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 7():468. PubMed ID: 17059604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QuickSNP: an automated web server for selection of tagSNPs.
Grover D; Woodfield AS; Verma R; Zandi PP; Levinson DF; Potash JB
Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W115-20. PubMed ID: 17517769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HapBlock: haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection software using a set of dynamic programming algorithms.
Zhang K; Qin Z; Chen T; Liu JS; Waterman MS; Sun F
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 15333454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ssSNPer: identifying statistically similar SNPs to aid interpretation of genetic association studies.
Nyholt DR
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2960-1. PubMed ID: 17038340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an algorithm of tagging SNPs selection by linkage disequilibrium.
Tang NL; Pharoah PD; Ma SL; Easton DF
Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 39(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 16427037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TagSNP selection based on pairwise LD criteria and power analysis in association studies.
Gopalakrishnan S; Qin ZS
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():511-22. PubMed ID: 17094265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Informative SNP selection methods based on SNP prediction.
He J; Zelikovsky A
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2007 Mar; 6(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 17393851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. HAPLOT: a graphical comparison of haplotype blocks, tagSNP sets and SNP variation for multiple populations.
Gu S; Pakstis AJ; Kidd KK
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3938-9. PubMed ID: 16131520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient selection of tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in multiple populations.
Howie BN; Carlson CS; Rieder MJ; Nickerson DA
Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 120(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 16680432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. TagSNP transferability and relative loss of variability prediction from HapMap to an admixed population.
Lins TC; Abreu BS; Pereira RW
J Biomed Sci; 2009 Aug; 16(1):73. PubMed ID: 19682379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multimarker analysis and imputation of multiple platform pooling-based genome-wide association studies.
Homer N; Tembe WD; Szelinger S; Redman M; Stephan DA; Pearson JV; Nelson SF; Craig D
Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(17):1896-902. PubMed ID: 18617537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
