206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18372253)
1. Infertility information on the World Wide Web: a cross-sectional survey of quality of infertility information on the internet in the UK.
Marriott JV; Stec P; El-Toukhy T; Khalaf Y; Braude P; Coomarasamy A
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1520-5. PubMed ID: 18372253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of fertility clinic websites.
Huang JY; Discepola F; Al-Fozan H; Tulandi T
Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 15749475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics?
Avraham S; Machtinger R; Cahan T; Sokolov A; Racowsky C; Seidman DS
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):222-6. PubMed ID: 24140039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Add-Ons" for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Do Patients Get Honest Information from Fertility Clinics' Websites?
Galiano V; Orvieto R; Machtinger R; Nahum R; Garzia E; Sulpizio P; Marconi AM; Seidman D
Reprod Sci; 2021 Dec; 28(12):3466-3472. PubMed ID: 33939166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of web-based information for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Barrow A; Palmer S; Thomas S; Guy S; Brotherton J; Dear L; Pearson J
Physiotherapy; 2018 Sep; 104(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 30030036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines.
Abusief ME; Hornstein MD; Jain T; ;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 17081534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
Thompson AE; Graydon SL
J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating health information sites on the Internet in Korea: a cross-sectional survey.
Aeree S; Mee-Kyung S
Asia Pac J Public Health; 2001; 13 Suppl():S19-22. PubMed ID: 12109242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A call for standardization of fertility clinic websites.
Huang JY; Discepola F; Tulandi T
Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):556-7. PubMed ID: 15749480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the quality of websites offering information on female hypoactive sexual desire disorder.
Touchet BK; Warnock JK; Yates WR; Wilkins KM
J Sex Marital Ther; 2007; 33(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 17541851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of information about kidney transplantation on the World Wide Web.
Hanif F; Abayasekara K; Willcocks L; Jolly EC; Jamieson NV; Praseedom RK; Goodacre JA; Read JC; Chaudhry A; Gibbs P
Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 17488387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the contents and quality of menopause information on the World Wide Web.
Pérez-López FR
Maturitas; 2004 Dec; 49(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 15531123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others.
Laplante-Lévesque A; Brännström KJ; Andersson G; Lunner T
Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):618-26. PubMed ID: 22731921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.
Weil AG; Bojanowski MW; Jamart J; Gustin T; Lévêque M
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):e31-9. PubMed ID: 23142585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and safety issues of web-based information about herbal medicines in the treatment of cancer.
Molassiotis A; Xu M
Complement Ther Med; 2004 Dec; 12(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 15649835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality comparison of websites related to developmental disabilities.
Reichow B; Shefcyk A; Bruder MB
Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Oct; 34(10):3077-83. PubMed ID: 23891722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of websites of obstetrics and gynecology departments: a cross-sectional study.
Rezniczek GA; Küppers L; Heuer H; Hefler LA; Buerkle B; Tempfer CB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Apr; 15():103. PubMed ID: 25928159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Information contained in miscarriage-related websites and the predictive value of website scoring systems.
Hardwick JC; MacKenzie FM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jan; 106(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 12475583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An investigation of the quality of breast cancer information provided on the internet by voluntary organisations in Great Britain.
Ream E; Blows E; Scanlon K; Richardson A
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Jul; 76(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 19179036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
