These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18372297)

  • 1. Parameters in television captioning for deaf and hard-of-hearing adults: effects of caption rate versus text reduction on comprehension.
    Burnham D; Leigh G; Noble W; Jones C; Tyler M; Grebennikov L; Varley A
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(3):391-404. PubMed ID: 18372297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Television literacy: comprehension of program content using closed captions for the deaf.
    Jelinek Lewis MS; Jackson DW
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2001; 6(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 15451862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading motivation, reading amount, and text comprehension in deaf and hearing adults.
    Parault SJ; Williams HM
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2010; 15(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 19933703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of the reading strategies used by adult and student deaf readers.
    Banner A; Wang Y
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(1):2-23. PubMed ID: 20591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The signed reading fluency of students who are deaf/hard of hearing.
    Easterbrooks SR; Huston SG
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(1):37-54. PubMed ID: 17607020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using miscue analysis to assess comprehension in deaf college readers.
    Albertini J; Mayer C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20488871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Near-verbatim captioning versus edited captioning for students who are deaf or hard of hearing: a preliminary investigation of effects on comprehension.
    Ward P; Wang Y; Paul P; Loeterman M
    Am Ann Deaf; 2007; 152(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 17642361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Viewer reaction to different television captioning speeds.
    Jensema C
    Am Ann Deaf; 1998 Oct; 143(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 9842059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How many deaf people are there in the United States? Estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
    Mitchell RE
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2006; 11(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 16177267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verbatim, standard, or edited? Reading patterns of different captioning styles among deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing viewers.
    Szarkowska A; Krejtz I; Klyszejko Z; Wieczorek A
    Am Ann Deaf; 2011; 156(4):363-78. PubMed ID: 22256538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonverbatim captioning in Dutch television programs: a text linguistic approach.
    Schilperoord J; de Groot V; van Son N
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(4):402-16. PubMed ID: 16037483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using open captions to revise writing in digital stories composed by d/Deaf and hard of hearing students.
    Strassman BK; O'Dell K
    Am Ann Deaf; 2012; 157(4):340-57. PubMed ID: 23259353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mode of acquisition as a factor in deaf children's reading comprehension.
    Wauters LN; Tellings AE; van Bon WH; Mak WM
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 17890236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Comprehension Processes in Sign Language Interpreter Videos with or without Captions.
    Debevc M; Milošević D; Kožuh I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127577. PubMed ID: 26010899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehension of television messages by deaf students at various stages of education.
    Cambra C; Silvestre N; Leal A
    Am Ann Deaf; 2009; 153(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 19350951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of two-way text messaging use with deaf students at the secondary level.
    Akamatsu CT; Mayer C; Farrelly S
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2006; 11(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 16237186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-esteem and coping strategies among deaf students.
    Jambor E; Elliott M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 15585749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hard-of-hearing or deaf: issues of ears, language, culture, and identity.
    Luey HS; Glass L; Elliott H
    Soc Work; 1995 Mar; 40(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 7732425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological awareness and decoding in deaf/hard-of-hearing students who use visual phonics.
    Narr RF
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2008; 13(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 18209021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Academic status and progress of deaf and hard-of-hearing students in general education classrooms.
    Antia SD; Jones PB; Reed S; Kreimeyer KH
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(3):293-311. PubMed ID: 19502625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.