367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18372450)
1. Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT.
Anderson SW; Rho E; Soto JA
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):418-27. PubMed ID: 18372450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Soto JA
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 18425544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detectability of choledocholithiasis on CT: The effect of positive intraduodenal enteric contrast on portovenous contrast-enhanced studies.
Ajlan AM; Mesurolle B; Stein L; Kao E; Artho G; Al-Rujaib M; Reinhold C
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2015; 21(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 26458858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis.
Guarise A; Baltieri S; Mainardi P; Faccioli N
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 15775893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
Mesihović R; Mehmedović A
Med Glas (Zenica); 2019 Feb; 16(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30256060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
Hjartarson JH; Hannesson P; Sverrisson I; Blöndal S; Ívarsson B; Björnsson ES
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 27181286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and timeliness of an abbreviated emergency department MRCP protocol for choledocholithiasis.
Tso DK; Almeida RR; Prabhakar AM; Singh AK; Raja AS; Flores EJ
Emerg Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 31030393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas: multi-detector row CT with 2D curved reformations--correlation with MRCP.
Sahani DV; Kadavigere R; Blake M; Fernandez-Del Castillo C; Lauwers GY; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):560-9. PubMed ID: 16436817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].
Norero E; Norero B; Huete A; Pimentel F; Cruz F; Ibáñez L; Martínez J; Jarufe N
Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 18769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.
Polistina FA; Frego M; Bisello M; Manzi E; Vardanega A; Perin B
World J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 7(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25918584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
Ward WH; Fluke LM; Hoagland BD; Zarow GJ; Held JM; Ricca RL
Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study.
Scaffidi MG; Luigiano C; Consolo P; Pellicano R; Giacobbe G; Gaeta M; Blandino A; Familiari L
Minerva Med; 2009 Oct; 100(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 19910887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
Badger WR; Borgert AJ; Kallies KJ; Kothari SN
Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dual-energy dual-source CT.
Stolzmann P; Frauenfelder T; Pfammatter T; Peter N; Scheffel H; Lachat M; Schmidt B; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Schertler T
Radiology; 2008 Nov; 249(2):682-91. PubMed ID: 18780822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Neitlich JD; Topazian M; Smith RC; Gupta A; Burrell MI; Rosenfield AT
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 9169700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
