82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18372460)
1. Imaging technology and practice assessment studies: importance of the baseline or reference performance level.
Gur D
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 18372460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review.
Wagner RF; Metz CE; Campbell G
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 17502262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technology assessment: scientific challenges.
Royal HD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 8079834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objectively measuring and comparing performance levels of diagnostic imaging systems and practices.
Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):641-2. PubMed ID: 17502252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
Obuchowski NA
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [ROC: a method for comparing the diagnostic performance of imaging procedures].
Oestmann JW; Galanski M
Rofo; 1989 Jul; 151(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 2546219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The research framework.
Jarvik JG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):873-8. PubMed ID: 11264069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Study design for the new millennium: changing how we perform research and practice medicine.
Jarvik JG
Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):593-4. PubMed ID: 11867770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Random-effects models in the receiver operating characteristic curve-based assessment of the effectiveness of diagnostic imaging technology: concepts, approaches, and issues.
Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S4-13; discussion S57-60, S68-9 pas. PubMed ID: 9419700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Technology assessment in anatomic pathology. An illustration of test evaluation using fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Raab SS; Bottles K; Cohen MB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Dec; 118(12):1173-80. PubMed ID: 7979909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical performance of diagnostic imaging modalities.
Wagner RF
Acad Radiol; 1999 Jan; 6 Suppl 1():S69-71. PubMed ID: 9891170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceptance testing.
Shearer DR
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(3):22. PubMed ID: 10180221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the assessment of diagnostic imaging technologies.
Gazelle GS; McMahon PM; Siebert U; Beinfeld MT
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 15858079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward consistent use of reporting scales in imaging studies.
Wagner RF
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 18206612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of technologies: stakes, methods, limits and suggestions].
Grenier P
J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 76(11):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8594189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging technology and practice assessments: diagnostic performance, clinical relevance, and generalizability in a changing environment.
Gur D
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 15516611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronary artery disease: myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography.
Plein S; Radjenovic A; Ridgway JP; Barmby D; Greenwood JP; Ball SG; Sivananthan MU
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 15858084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Assessment of diagnostic result for medical image by receiver operating characteristic and forced choice].
Yue X; Ye Y; Deng Z; Jiang D; Zheng C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 15(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12553254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
